mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Semi-Supervised Contrastive Learning for Remote Sensing: Identifying Ancient Urbanization in the South Central Andes

arXiv 2112.06437 ↗First posted 13 Dec 2021cs.CV cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Archaeology has long faced fundamental issues of sampling and scalar representation. Traditionally, the local-to-regional-scale views of settlement patterns are produced through systematic pedestrian surveys. Recently, systematic manual survey of satellite and aerial imagery has enabled continuous distributional views of archaeological phenomena at interregional scales. However, such 'brute force' manual imagery survey methods are both time- and labor-intensive, as well as prone to inter-observer differences in sensitivity and specificity. The development of self-supervised learning methods offers a scalable learning scheme for locating archaeological features using unlabeled satellite and historical aerial images. However, archaeological features are generally only visible in a very small proportion relative to the landscape, while the modern contrastive-supervised learning approach typically yields an inferior performance on highly imbalanced datasets. In this work, we propose a framework to address this long-tail problem. As opposed to the existing contrastive learning approaches that treat the labelled and unlabeled data separately, our proposed method reforms the learning paradigm under a semi-supervised setting in order to utilize the precious annotated data (<7% in our setting). Specifically, the highly unbalanced nature of the data is employed as the prior knowledge in order to form pseudo negative pairs by ranking the similarities between unannotated image patches and annotated anchor images. In this study, we used 95,358 unlabeled images and 5,830 labelled images in order to solve the issues associated with detecting ancient buildings from a long-tailed satellite image dataset. From the results, our semi-supervised contrastive learning model achieved a promising testing balanced accuracy of 79.0%, which is a 3.8% improvement as compared to other state-of-the-art approaches.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 76 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Dec 2021.

Builds on

18 of 76 references.

References · 18

  1. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  2. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,513
  3. 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,750
  4. 2020Exploring Simple Siamese Representation Learningcited by 2,866
  5. 2020Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster Assignmentscited by 2,857
  6. 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,829
  7. 2018Unsupervised Feature Learning via Non-Parametric Instance-level Discriminationcited by 1,845
  8. 2016Unsupervised Learning of Visual Representations by Solving Jigsaw Puzzlescited by 1,382
  9. 2017Multi-Task Learning Using Uncertainty to Weigh Losses for Scene Geometry and Semanticscited by 1,358
  10. 2018Learning deep representations by mutual information estimation and maximizationcited by 1,273
  11. 2018Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labelscited by 997
  12. 2020What Makes for Good Views for Contrastive Learning?cited by 846
6 more
  1. 2020Debiased Contrastive Learningcited by 356
  2. 2021Parametric Contrastive Learningcited by 217
  3. 2020Rethinking the Value of Labels for Improving Class-Imbalanced Learningcited by 216
  4. 2019Local Aggregation for Unsupervised Learning of Visual Embeddingscited by 204
  5. 2021Semi-supervised Contrastive Learning with Similarity Co-calibrationcited by 26
  6. 2020Imbalanced classification: a paradigm-based reviewcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.

2 papers.