mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Confidence intervals for the random forest generalization error

arXiv 2112.06101 ↗First posted 11 Dec 2021stat.ML cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We show that the byproducts of the standard training process of a random forest yield not only the well known and almost computationally free out-of-bag point estimate of the model generalization error, but also give a direct path to compute confidence intervals for the generalization error which avoids processes of data splitting and model retraining. Besides the low computational cost involved in their construction, these confidence intervals are shown through simulations to have good coverage and appropriate shrinking rate of their width in terms of the training sample size.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Dec 2021.

Builds on

4 of 23 references.

References · 4

  1. 2016Generalized Random Forestscited by 312
  2. 2015ranger: A Fast Implementation of Random Forests for High Dimensional Data in C++ and Rcited by 172
  3. 2015A Random Forest Guided Tourcited by 168
  4. 2020Cross-validation Confidence Intervals for Test Errorcited by 33

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.

1 paper.