Test Set Sizing Via Random Matrix Theory
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper uses techniques from Random Matrix Theory to find the ideal training-testing data split for a simple linear regression with m data points, each an independent n-dimensional multivariate Gaussian. It defines "ideal" as satisfying the integrity metric, i.e. the empirical model error is the actual measurement noise, and thus fairly reflects the value or lack of same of the model. This paper is the first to solve for the training and test size for any model in a way that is truly optimal. The number of data points in the training set is the root of a quartic polynomial Theorem 1 derives which depends only on m and n; the covariance matrix of the multivariate Gaussian, the true model parameters, and the true measurement noise drop out of the calculations. The critical mathematical difficulties were realizing that the problems herein were discussed in the context of the Jacobi Ensemble, a probability distribution describing the eigenvalues of a known random matrix model, and evaluating a new integral in the style of Selberg and Aomoto. Mathematical results are supported with thorough computational evidence. This paper is a step towards automatic choices of training/test set sizes in machine learning.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 0 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Dec 2021.
Builds on
0 of 30 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
2 papers.
- 2022Optimal Ratio for Data Splittingcited by 18
- 2025Test Set Sizing for the Ridge Regressioncited by 0
- 2025Test Set Sizing for the Ridge Regression27 Apr 2025
- 2022Optimal Ratio for Data Splitting7 Feb 2022