mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Surrogate-data-enriched Physics-Aware Neural Networks

arXiv 2112.05489 ↗First posted 10 Dec 2021cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Neural networks can be used as surrogates for PDE models. They can be made physics-aware by penalizing underlying equations or the conservation of physical properties in the loss function during training. Current approaches allow to additionally respect data from numerical simulations or experiments in the training process. However, this data is frequently expensive to obtain and thus only scarcely available for complex models. In this work, we investigate how physics-aware models can be enriched with computationally cheaper, but inexact, data from other surrogate models like Reduced-Order Models (ROMs). In order to avoid trusting too-low-fidelity surrogate solutions, we develop an approach that is sensitive to the error in inexact data. As a proof of concept, we consider the one-dimensional wave equation and show that the training accuracy is increased by two orders of magnitude when inexact data from ROMs is incorporated.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Dec 2021.

Builds on

7 of 18 references.

References · 7

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,806
  3. 2015Automatic differentiation in machine learning: a surveycited by 846
  4. 2020When and why PINNs fail to train: A neural tangent kernel perspectivecited by 629
  5. 2020Understanding and mitigating gradient pathologies in physics-informed neural networkscited by 134
  6. 2020CFDNet: a deep learning-based accelerator for fluid simulationscited by 40
  7. 2018Comparison of data-driven uncertainty quantification methods for a carbon dioxide storage benchmark scenariocited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3.

3 papers.