mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Semantic Search as Extractive Paraphrase Span Detection

arXiv 2112.04886 ↗First posted 9 Dec 2021cs.CLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we approach the problem of semantic search by framing the search task as paraphrase span detection, i.e. given a segment of text as a query phrase, the task is to identify its paraphrase in a given document, the same modelling setup as typically used in extractive question answering. On the Turku Paraphrase Corpus of 100,000 manually extracted Finnish paraphrase pairs including their original document context, we find that our paraphrase span detection model outperforms two strong retrieval baselines (lexical similarity and BERT sentence embeddings) by 31.9pp and 22.4pp respectively in terms of exact match, and by 22.3pp and 12.9pp in terms of token-level F-score. This demonstrates a strong advantage of modelling the task in terms of span retrieval, rather than sentence similarity. Additionally, we introduce a method for creating artificial paraphrase data through back-translation, suitable for languages where manually annotated paraphrase resources for training the span detection model are not available.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Dec 2021.

Builds on

22 of 32 references.

References · 22

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  3. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
  4. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,115
  5. 2018Know What You Don't Know: Unanswerable Questions for SQuADcited by 1,538
  6. 2017SemEval-2017 Task 1: Semantic Textual Similarity - Multilingual and Cross-lingual Focused Evaluationcited by 998
  7. 2015Improving Neural Machine Translation Models with Monolingual Datacited by 784
  8. 2017Reading Wikipedia to Answer Open-Domain Questionscited by 777
  9. 2019On the Cross-lingual Transferability of Monolingual Representationscited by 575
  10. 2020TyDi QA: A Benchmark for Information-Seeking Question Answering in Typologically Diverse Languagescited by 486
  11. 2020RocketQA: An Optimized Training Approach to Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 410
  12. 2016Diverse Beam Search: Decoding Diverse Solutions from Neural Sequence Modelscited by 299
10 more
  1. 2021ERNIE 3.0: Large-scale Knowledge Enhanced Pre-training for Language Understanding and Generationcited by 258
  2. 2020MKQA: A Linguistically Diverse Benchmark for Multilingual Open Domain Question Answeringcited by 151
  3. 2019Multilingual is not enough: BERT for Finnishcited by 118
  4. 2020A Survey on Machine Reading Comprehension: Tasks, Evaluation Metrics and Benchmark Datasetscited by 40
  5. 2021Finnish Paraphrase Corpuscited by 10
  6. 2020PARADE: A New Dataset for Paraphrase Identification Requiring Computer Science Domain Knowledgecited by 7
  7. 2021Corpus-Based Paraphrase Detection Experiments and Reviewcited by 5
  8. 2021Annotation Guidelines for the Turku Paraphrase Corpuscited by 2
  9. 2021Quantitative Evaluation of Alternative Translations in a Corpus of Highly Dissimilar Finnish Paraphrasescited by 1
  10. 2021Czech News Dataset for Semantic Textual Similaritycited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.