mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Reinforcement learning for options on target volatility funds

arXiv 2112.01841 ↗First posted 3 Dec 2021q-fin.PR cs.LG q-fin.CPcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this work we deal with the funding costs rising from hedging the risky securities underlying a target volatility strategy (TVS), a portfolio of risky assets and a risk-free one dynamically rebalanced in order to keep the realized volatility of the portfolio on a certain level. The uncertainty in the TVS risky portfolio composition along with the difference in hedging costs for each component requires to solve a control problem to evaluate the option prices. We derive an analytical solution of the problem in the Black and Scholes (BS) scenario. Then we use Reinforcement Learning (RL) techniques to determine the fund composition leading to the most conservative price under the local volatility (LV) model, for which an a priori solution is not available. We show how the performances of the RL agents are compatible with those obtained by applying path-wise the BS analytical strategy to the TVS dynamics, which therefore appears competitive also in the LV scenario.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Dec 2021.

Builds on

3 of 25 references.

References · 3

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,592
  2. 2015High-Dimensional Continuous Control Using Generalized Advantage Estimationcited by 1,940
  3. 2017QLBS: Q-Learner in the Black-Scholes(-Merton) Worldscited by 23

Built on by

Not cited yet.