mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Hierarchical clustering: visualization, feature importance and model selection

arXiv 2112.01372 ↗First posted 30 Nov 2021stat.ME cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We propose methods for the analysis of hierarchical clustering that fully use the multi-resolution structure provided by a dendrogram. Specifically, we propose a loss for choosing between clustering methods, a feature importance score and a graphical tool for visualizing the segmentation of features in a dendrogram. Current approaches to these tasks lead to loss of information since they require the user to generate a single partition of the instances by cutting the dendrogram at a specified level. Our proposed methods, instead, use the full structure of the dendrogram. The key insight behind the proposed methods is to view a dendrogram as a phylogeny. This analogy permits the assignment of a feature value to each internal node of a tree through an evolutionary model. Real and simulated datasets provide evidence that our proposed framework has desirable outcomes and gives more insights than state-of-art approaches. We provide an R package that implements our methods.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Nov 2021.

Builds on

4 of 53 references.

References · 4

  1. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
  2. 2017Converting High-Dimensional Regression to High-Dimensional Conditional Density Estimationcited by 34
  3. 2015Clustering strategy and method selectioncited by 5
  4. 2019NLS: an accurate and yet easy-to-interpret regression methodcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2.

2 papers.