mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Evaluation of mathematical questioning strategies using data collected through weak supervision

arXiv 2112.00985 ↗First posted 2 Dec 2021cs.AI cs.HC cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A large body of research demonstrates how teachers' questioning strategies can improve student learning outcomes. However, developing new scenarios is challenging because of the lack of training data for a specific scenario and the costs associated with labeling. This paper presents a high-fidelity, AI-based classroom simulator to help teachers rehearse research-based mathematical questioning skills. Using a human-in-the-loop approach, we collected a high-quality training dataset for a mathematical questioning scenario. Using recent advances in uncertainty quantification, we evaluated our conversational agent for usability and analyzed the practicality of incorporating a human-in-the-loop approach for data collection and system evaluation for a mathematical questioning scenario.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Dec 2021.

Builds on

6 of 20 references.

References · 6

  1. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
  2. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
  3. 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,307
  4. 2016Data Programming: Creating Large Training Sets, Quicklycited by 246
  5. 2019MoEL: Mixture of Empathetic Listenerscited by 91
  6. 2017Augmenting End-to-End Dialog Systems with Commonsense Knowledgecited by 18

Built on by

Not cited yet.