Finding, Scoring and Explaining Arguments in Bayesian Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We propose a new approach to explain Bayesian Networks. The approach revolves around a new definition of a probabilistic argument and the evidence it provides. We define a notion of independent arguments, and propose an algorithm to extract a list of relevant, independent arguments given a Bayesian Network, a target node and a set of observations. To demonstrate the relevance of the arguments, we show how we can use the extracted arguments to approximate message passing. Finally, we show a simple scheme to explain the arguments in natural language.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Nov 2021.
Builds on
3 of 18 references.
References · 3
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
- 2020An Incremental Explanation of Inference in Hybrid Bayesian Networks for Increasing Model Trustworthiness and Supporting Clinical Decision Makingcited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.