mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Collective discrete optimisation as judgment aggregation

arXiv 2112.00574 ↗First posted 1 Dec 2021cs.AI cs.MAcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Many important collective decision-making problems can be seen as multi-agent versions of discrete optimisation problems. Participatory budgeting, for instance, is the collective version of the knapsack problem; other examples include collective scheduling, and collective spanning trees. Rather than developing a specific model, as well as specific algorithmic techniques, for each of these problems, we propose to represent and solve them in the unifying framework of judgment aggregation with weighted issues. We provide a modular definition of collective discrete optimisation (CDO) rules based on coupling a set scoring function with an operator, and we show how they generalise several existing procedures developed for specific CDO problems. We also give an implementation based on integer linear programming (ILP) and test it on the problem of collective spanning trees.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Dec 2021.

Builds on

6 of 30 references.

References · 6

  1. 2020Participatory Budgeting: Models and Approachescited by 23
  2. 2020Knapsack Voting for Participatory Budgetingcited by 11
  3. 2018A Framework for Approval-based Budgeting Methodscited by 8
  4. 2018Collective Schedules: Scheduling Meets Computational Social Choicecited by 2
  5. 2021Egalitarian Judgment Aggregationcited by 2
  6. 2015A partial taxonomy of judgment aggregation rules, and their propertiescited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.