mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Closeness Centrality via the Condorcet Principle

arXiv 2112.00494 ↗First posted 1 Dec 2021cs.SI cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We uncover a new relation between Closeness centrality and the Condorcet principle. We define a Condorcet winner in a graph as a node that compared to any other node is closer to more nodes. In other words, if we assume that nodes vote on a closer candidate, a Condorcet winner would win a two-candidate election against any other node in a plurality vote. We show that Closeness centrality and its random-walk version, Random-Walk Closeness centrality, are the only classic centrality measures that are Condorcet consistent on trees, i.e., if a Condorcet winner exists, they rank it first. While they are not Condorcet consistent in general graphs, we show that Closeness centrality satisfies the Condorcet Comparison property that states that out of two adjacent nodes, the one preferred by more nodes has higher centrality. We show that Closeness centrality is the only regular distance-based centrality with such a property.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 1 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Dec 2021.

Builds on

1 of 25 references.

References · 1

  1. 2013Axioms for Centralitycited by 16

Built on by

Not cited yet.