Effective and efficient structure learning with pruning and model averaging strategies
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Learning the structure of a Bayesian Network (BN) with score-based solutions involves exploring the search space of possible graphs and moving towards the graph that maximises a given objective function. Some algorithms offer exact solutions that guarantee to return the graph with the highest objective score, while others offer approximate solutions in exchange for reduced computational complexity. This paper describes an approximate BN structure learning algorithm, which we call Model Averaging Hill-Climbing (MAHC), that combines two novel strategies with hill-climbing search. The algorithm starts by pruning the search space of graphs, where the pruning strategy can be viewed as an aggressive version of the pruning strategies that are typically applied to combinatorial optimisation structure learning problems. It then performs model averaging in the hill-climbing search process and moves to the neighbouring graph that maximises the objective function, on average, for that neighbouring graph and over all its valid neighbouring graphs. Comparisons with other algorithms spanning different classes of learning suggest that the combination of aggressive pruning with model averaging is both effective and efficient, particularly in the presence of data noise.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Dec 2021.
Builds on
9 of 30 references.
References · 9
- 2013Learning Bayesian Networks: The Combination of Knowledge and Statistical Datacited by 185
- 2013Causal Inference in the Presence of Latent Variables and Selection Biascited by 165
- 2021A survey of Bayesian Network structure learningcited by 85
- 2013Learning Equivalence Classes of Bayesian Networks Structurescited by 75
- 2020Large-scale empirical validation of Bayesian Network structure learning algorithms with noisy datacited by 29
- 2013Properties of Bayesian Belief Network Learning Algorithmscited by 13
- 2019Evaluating structure learning algorithms with a balanced scoring functioncited by 10
- 2020Learning Bayesian Networks that enable full propagation of evidencecited by 7
- 2020Approximate learning of high dimensional Bayesian network structures via pruning of Candidate Parent Setscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
7 papers.
- 2023Open problems in causal structure learning: A case study of COVID-19 in the UKcited by 7
- 2025Robust Causal Discovery under Imperfect Structural Constraintscited by 2
- 2026Dynamic Expert-Guided Model Averaging for Causal Discoverycited by 2
- 2023Tuning structure learning algorithms with out-of-sample and resampling strategiescited by 1
- 2024Investigating the validity of structure learning algorithms in identifying risk factors for intervention in patients with diabetescited by 1
- 2025Integrating Probabilistic Trees and Causal Networks for Clinical and Epidemiological Datacited by 1
- 2026Stable Causal Discovery via Directed Acyclic Graph Aggregationcited by 0
- 2026Stable Causal Discovery via Directed Acyclic Graph Aggregation18 May 2026
- 2026Dynamic Expert-Guided Model Averaging for Causal Discovery23 Jan 2026
- 2025Robust Causal Discovery under Imperfect Structural Constraints10 Nov 2025
- 2025Integrating Probabilistic Trees and Causal Networks for Clinical and Epidemiological Data27 Jan 2025
- 2024Investigating the validity of structure learning algorithms in identifying risk factors for intervention in patients with diabetes21 Mar 2024
- 2023Tuning structure learning algorithms with out-of-sample and resampling strategies24 Jun 2023
- 2023Open problems in causal structure learning: A case study of COVID-19 in the UK5 May 2023