mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Non-splitting Neyman-Pearson Classifiers

arXiv 2112.00329 ↗First posted 1 Dec 2021stat.ME math.ST stat.THcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The Neyman-Pearson (NP) binary classification paradigm constrains the more severe type of error (e.g., the type I error) under a preferred level while minimizing the other (e.g., the type II error). This paradigm is suitable for applications such as severe disease diagnosis, fraud detection, among others. A series of NP classifiers have been developed to guarantee the type I error control with high probability. However, these existing classifiers involve a sample splitting step: a mixture of class 0 and class 1 observations to construct a scoring function and some left-out class 0 observations to construct a threshold. This splitting enables classifier construction built upon independence, but it amounts to insufficient use of data for training and a potentially higher type II error. Leveraging a canonical linear discriminant analysis model, we derive a quantitative CLT for a certain functional of quadratic forms of the inverse of sample and population covariance matrices, and based on this result, develop for the first time NP classifiers without splitting the training sample. Numerical experiments have confirmed the advantages of our new non-splitting parametric strategy.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 1 Dec 2021.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.