A generic physics-informed neural network-based framework for reliability assessment of multi-state systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this paper, we leverage the recent advances in physics-informed neural network (PINN) and develop a generic PINN-based framework to assess the reliability of multi-state systems (MSSs). The proposed methodology consists of two major steps. In the first step, we recast the reliability assessment of MSS as a machine learning problem using the framework of PINN. A feedforward neural network with two individual loss groups are constructed to encode the initial condition and state transitions governed by ordinary differential equations (ODEs) in MSS. Next, we tackle the problem of high imbalance in the magnitude of the back-propagated gradients in PINN from a multi-task learning perspective. Particularly, we treat each element in the loss function as an individual task, and adopt a gradient surgery approach named projecting conflicting gradients (PCGrad), where a task's gradient is projected onto the norm plane of any other task that has a conflicting gradient. The gradient projection operation significantly mitigates the detrimental effects caused by the gradient interference when training PINN, thus accelerating the convergence speed of PINN to high-precision solutions to MSS reliability assessment. With the proposed PINN-based framework, we investigate its applications for MSS reliability assessment in several different contexts in terms of time-independent or dependent state transitions and system scales varying from small to medium. The results demonstrate that the proposed PINN-based framework shows generic and remarkable performance in MSS reliability assessment, and the incorporation of PCGrad in PINN leads to substantial improvement in solution quality and convergence speed.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 87 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Dec 2021.
Builds on
11 of 87 references.
References · 11
- 2020Gradient Surgery for Multi-Task Learningcited by 1,256
- 2015Automatic differentiation in machine learning: a surveycited by 855
- 2020When and why PINNs fail to train: A neural tangent kernel perspectivecited by 634
- 2019DeepXDE: A deep learning library for solving differential equationscited by 619
- 2018Deep Hidden Physics Models: Deep Learning of Nonlinear Partial Differential Equationscited by 235
- 2020Physics-informed learning of governing equations from scarce datacited by 167
- 2020Understanding and mitigating gradient pathologies in physics-informed neural networkscited by 135
- 2020A Physics-Informed Machine Learning Approach for Solving Heat Transfer Equation in Advanced Manufacturing and Engineering Applicationscited by 53
- 2020Fusing Physics-based and Deep Learning Models for Prognosticscited by 40
- 2021Physics-Informed Deep Learning: A Promising Technique for System Reliability Assessmentcited by 3
- 2021Adaptive network reliability analysis: Methodology and applications to power gridcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2024From PINNs to PIKANs: Recent Advances in Physics-Informed Machine Learningcited by 73
- 2024ConFIG: Towards Conflict-free Training of Physics Informed Neural Networkscited by 46
- 2022A Comprehensive Review of Digital Twin -- Part 1: Modeling and Twinning Enabling Technologiescited by 28
- 2026Tackling Failure Modes of PINNs and PIKANs Using Conflict-Free Gradientscited by 2
- 2026Tackling Failure Modes of PINNs and PIKANs Using Conflict-Free Gradients13 Sep 2026
- 2024From PINNs to PIKANs: Recent Advances in Physics-Informed Machine Learning17 Oct 2024
- 2024ConFIG: Towards Conflict-free Training of Physics Informed Neural Networks20 Aug 2024
- 2022A Comprehensive Review of Digital Twin -- Part 1: Modeling and Twinning Enabling Technologies26 Aug 2022