mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

The Power of Communication in a Distributed Multi-Agent System

arXiv 2111.15611 ↗First posted 30 Nov 2021cs.AI cs.LG cs.MAcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Single-Agent (SA) Reinforcement Learning systems have shown outstanding re-sults on non-stationary problems. However, Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning(MARL) can surpass SA systems generally and when scaling. Furthermore, MAsystems can be super-powered by collaboration, which can happen through ob-serving others, or a communication system used to share information betweencollaborators. Here, we developed a distributed MA learning mechanism withthe ability to communicate based on decentralised partially observable Markovdecision processes (Dec-POMDPs) and Graph Neural Networks (GNNs). Minimis-ing the time and energy consumed by training Machine Learning models whileimproving performance can be achieved by collaborative MA mechanisms. Wedemonstrate this in a real-world scenario, an offshore wind farm, including a set ofdistributed wind turbines, where the objective is to maximise collective efficiency.Compared to a SA system, MA collaboration has shown significantly reducedtraining time and higher cumulative rewards in unseen and scaled scenarios.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Nov 2021.

Builds on

25 of 63 references.

References · 25

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,592
  2. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,888
  3. 2017Neural Message Passing for Quantum Chemistrycited by 3,471
  4. 2016Convolutional Neural Networks on Graphs with Fast Localized Spectral Filteringcited by 2,086
  5. 2018Graph Neural Networks: A Review of Methods and Applicationscited by 1,574
  6. 2014DeepWalk: Online Learning of Social Representationscited by 1,544
  7. 2017Multi-Agent Actor-Critic for Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Environmentscited by 1,525
  8. 2015Gated Graph Sequence Neural Networkscited by 794
  9. 2016Learning to Communicate with Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 566
  10. 2019Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning: A Selective Overview of Theories and Algorithmscited by 555
  11. 2016Learning Multiagent Communication with Backpropagationcited by 359
  12. 2016Safe, Multi-Agent, Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Drivingcited by 302
13 more
  1. 2018Human-level performance in first-person multiplayer games with population-based deep reinforcement learningcited by 260
  2. 2017Emergence of Grounded Compositional Language in Multi-Agent Populationscited by 259
  3. 2018A Survey and Critique of Multiagent Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 174
  4. 2017A Survey of Learning in Multiagent Environments: Dealing with Non-Stationaritycited by 93
  5. 2019Learning to Schedule Communication in Multi-agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 90
  6. 2019Learning Decentralized Controllers for Robot Swarms with Graph Neural Networkscited by 62
  7. 2019Deep Reinforcement Learning meets Graph Neural Networks: exploring a routing optimization use casecited by 53
  8. 2017On the Origin of Deep Learningcited by 23
  9. 2021Expected Value of Communication for Planning in Ad Hoc Teamworkcited by 19
  10. 2019Improving Coordination in Small-Scale Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning through Memory-driven Communicationcited by 18
  11. 2019Message-Dropout: An Efficient Training Method for Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 17
  12. 2019Optimal algebraic Breadth-First Search for sparse graphscited by 3
  13. 2021Learning Connectivity for Data Distribution in Robot Teamscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 13 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

4 papers.