TiWS-iForest: Isolation Forest in Weakly Supervised and Tiny ML scenarios
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Unsupervised anomaly detection tackles the problem of finding anomalies inside datasets without the labels availability; since data tagging is typically hard or expensive to obtain, such approaches have seen huge applicability in recent years. In this context, Isolation Forest is a popular algorithm able to define an anomaly score by means of an ensemble of peculiar trees called isolation trees. These are built using a random partitioning procedure that is extremely fast and cheap to train. However, we find that the standard algorithm might be improved in terms of memory requirements, latency and performances; this is of particular importance in low resources scenarios and in TinyML implementations on ultra-constrained microprocessors. Moreover, Anomaly Detection approaches currently do not take advantage of weak supervisions: being typically consumed in Decision Support Systems, feedback from the users, even if rare, can be a valuable source of information that is currently unexplored. Beside showing iForest training limitations, we propose here TiWS-iForest, an approach that, by leveraging weak supervision is able to reduce Isolation Forest complexity and to enhance detection performances. We showed the effectiveness of TiWS-iForest on real word datasets and we share the code in a public repository to enhance reproducibility.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Nov 2021.
Builds on
5 of 35 references.
References · 5
- 2020Benchmarking TinyML Systems: Challenges and Directioncited by 91
- 2018Extended Isolation Forestcited by 81
- 2021TinyOL: TinyML with Online-Learning on Microcontrollerscited by 65
- 2017Incorporating Feedback into Tree-based Anomaly Detectioncited by 7
- 2020Isolation Mondrian Forest for Batch and Online Anomaly Detectioncited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2.
2 papers.