mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Evaluation of Interpretability for Deep Learning algorithms in EEG Emotion Recognition: A case study in Autism

arXiv 2111.13208 ↗First posted 25 Nov 2021eess.SP cs.LGcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Current models on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) have shown an evident and quantified lack of reliability for measuring feature-relevance when statistically entangled features are proposed for training deep classifiers. There has been an increase in the application of Deep Learning in clinical trials to predict early diagnosis of neuro-developmental disorders, such as Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). However, the inclusion of more reliable saliency-maps to obtain more trustworthy and interpretable metrics using neural activity features is still insufficiently mature for practical applications in diagnostics or clinical trials. Moreover, in ASD research the inclusion of deep classifiers that use neural measures to predict viewed facial emotions is relatively unexplored. Therefore, in this study we propose the evaluation of a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) for electroencephalography (EEG)-based facial emotion recognition decoding complemented with a novel RemOve-And-Retrain (ROAR) methodology to recover highly relevant features used in the classifier. Specifically, we compare well-known relevance maps such as Layer-Wise Relevance Propagation (LRP), PatternNet, Pattern-Attribution, and Smooth-Grad Squared. This study is the first to consolidate a more transparent feature-relevance calculation for a successful EEG-based facial emotion recognition using a within-subject-trained CNN in typically-developed and ASD individuals.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 81 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Nov 2021.

Builds on

15 of 81 references.

References · 15

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,259
  3. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  4. 2014Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networkscited by 2,974
  5. 2018Sanity Checks for Saliency Mapscited by 1,149
  6. 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,097
  7. 2017Grad-CAM++: Improved Visual Explanations for Deep Convolutional Networkscited by 936
  8. 2020Evaluation: from precision, recall and F-measure to ROC, informedness, markedness and correlationcited by 420
  9. 2017Methods for Interpreting and Understanding Deep Neural Networkscited by 342
  10. 2017The (Un)reliability of saliency methodscited by 331
  11. 2017Learning how to explain neural networks: PatternNet and PatternAttributioncited by 84
  12. 2018iNNvestigate neural networks!cited by 58
3 more
  1. 2019Why are Saliency Maps Noisy? Cause of and Solution to Noisy Saliency Mapscited by 34
  2. 2020Explaining Deep Neural Networks and Beyond: A Review of Methods and Applicationscited by 22
  3. 2021Interpretable SincNet-based Deep Learning for Emotion Recognition from EEG brain activitycited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

6 papers.