mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Selection of pseudo-annotated data for adverse drug reaction classification across drug groups

arXiv 2111.12477 ↗First posted 24 Nov 2021cs.CL cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Automatic monitoring of adverse drug events (ADEs) or reactions (ADRs) is currently receiving significant attention from the biomedical community. In recent years, user-generated data on social media has become a valuable resource for this task. Neural models have achieved impressive performance on automatic text classification for ADR detection. Yet, training and evaluation of these methods are carried out on user-generated texts about a targeted drug. In this paper, we assess the robustness of state-of-the-art neural architectures across different drug groups. We investigate several strategies to use pseudo-labeled data in addition to a manually annotated train set. Out-of-dataset experiments diagnose the bottleneck of supervised models in terms of breakdown performance, while additional pseudo-labeled data improves overall results regardless of the text selection strategy.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Nov 2021.

Builds on

5 of 19 references.

References · 5

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2019BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text miningcited by 1,947
  3. 2017Interactive Attention Networks for Aspect-Level Sentiment Classificationcited by 91
  4. 2017Semi-Supervised Recurrent Neural Network for Adverse Drug Reaction Mention Extractioncited by 2
  5. 2018Co-training for Extraction of Adverse Drug Reaction Mentions from Tweetscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.