Selection of pseudo-annotated data for adverse drug reaction classification across drug groups
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Automatic monitoring of adverse drug events (ADEs) or reactions (ADRs) is currently receiving significant attention from the biomedical community. In recent years, user-generated data on social media has become a valuable resource for this task. Neural models have achieved impressive performance on automatic text classification for ADR detection. Yet, training and evaluation of these methods are carried out on user-generated texts about a targeted drug. In this paper, we assess the robustness of state-of-the-art neural architectures across different drug groups. We investigate several strategies to use pseudo-labeled data in addition to a manually annotated train set. Out-of-dataset experiments diagnose the bottleneck of supervised models in terms of breakdown performance, while additional pseudo-labeled data improves overall results regardless of the text selection strategy.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Nov 2021.
Builds on
5 of 19 references.
References · 5
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2019BioBERT: a pre-trained biomedical language representation model for biomedical text miningcited by 1,947
- 2017Interactive Attention Networks for Aspect-Level Sentiment Classificationcited by 91
- 2017Semi-Supervised Recurrent Neural Network for Adverse Drug Reaction Mention Extractioncited by 2
- 2018Co-training for Extraction of Adverse Drug Reaction Mentions from Tweetscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.