mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

From Kepler to Newton: Explainable AI for Science

arXiv 2111.12210 ↗First posted 24 Nov 2021cs.AI cs.LG cs.SCcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The Observation--Hypothesis--Prediction--Experimentation loop paradigm for scientific research has been practiced by researchers for years towards scientific discoveries. However, with data explosion in both mega-scale and milli-scale scientific research, it has been sometimes very difficult to manually analyze the data and propose new hypotheses to drive the cycle for scientific discovery. In this paper, we discuss the role of Explainable AI in scientific discovery process by demonstrating an Explainable AI-based paradigm for science discovery. The key is to use Explainable AI to help derive data or model interpretations, hypotheses, as well as scientific discoveries or insights. We show how computational and data-intensive methodology -- together with experimental and theoretical methodology -- can be seamlessly integrated for scientific research. To demonstrate the AI-based science discovery process, and to pay our respect to some of the greatest minds in human history, we show how Kepler's laws of planetary motion and Newton's law of universal gravitation can be rediscovered by (Explainable) AI based on Tycho Brahe's astronomical observation data, whose works were leading the scientific revolution in the 16-17th century. This work also highlights the important role of Explainable AI (as compared to Blackbox AI) in science discovery to help humans prevent or better prepare for the possible technological singularity that may happen in the future, since science is not only about the know how, but also the know why. Presentation of the work is available at https://slideslive.com/38986142/from-kepler-to-newton-explainable-ai-for-science-discovery.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Nov 2021.

Builds on

14 of 60 references.

References · 14

  1. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  2. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,548
  3. 2019Attention is not Explanationcited by 929
  4. 2019Attention is not not Explanationcited by 636
  5. 2019AI Feynman: a Physics-Inspired Method for Symbolic Regressioncited by 548
  6. 2019The many Shapley values for model explanationcited by 344
  7. 2020Discovering Symbolic Models from Deep Learning with Inductive Biasescited by 344
  8. 2018Explainable Recommendation: A Survey and New Perspectivescited by 210
  9. 2020AI Feynman 2.0: Pareto-optimal symbolic regression exploiting graph modularitycited by 144
  10. 2019Bayesian Symbolic Regressioncited by 78
  11. 2021Counterfactual Explainable Recommendationcited by 60
  12. 2020Logic Guided Genetic Algorithmscited by 6
2 more
  1. 2019Symbolic regression by uniform random global searchcited by 1
  2. 2019Recreation of the Periodic Table with an Unsupervised Machine Learning Algorithmcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 5; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area: