Model-agnostic bias mitigation methods with regressor distribution control for Wasserstein-based fairness metrics
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This article is a companion paper to our earlier work Miroshnikov et al. (2021) on fairness interpretability, which introduces bias explanations. In the current work, we propose a bias mitigation methodology based upon the construction of post-processed models with fairer regressor distributions for Wasserstein-based fairness metrics. By identifying the list of predictors contributing the most to the bias, we reduce the dimensionality of the problem by mitigating the bias originating from those predictors. The post-processing methodology involves reshaping the predictor distributions by balancing the positive and negative bias explanations and allows for the regressor bias to decrease. We design an algorithm that uses Bayesian optimization to construct the bias-performance efficient frontier over the family of post-processed models, from which an optimal model is selected. Our novel methodology performs optimization in low-dimensional spaces and avoids expensive model retraining.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Nov 2021.
Builds on
11 of 40 references.
References · 11
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
- 2014Certifying and removing disparate impactcited by 715
- 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
- 2018Fairness Without Demographics in Repeated Loss Minimizationcited by 364
- 2020Fairness without Demographics through Adversarially Reweighted Learningcited by 251
- 2019Identifying and Correcting Label Bias in Machine Learningcited by 146
- 2020True to the Model or True to the Data?cited by 126
- 2015Generalization in Adaptive Data Analysis and Holdout Reusecited by 83
- 2020Wasserstein-based fairness interpretability framework for machine learning modelscited by 14
- 2021Stability theory of game-theoretic group feature explanations for machine learning modelscited by 4
- 2019An Introduction to Artificial Intelligence and Solutions to the Problems of Algorithmic Discriminationcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
5 papers.
- 2023Retiring DeltaDP: New Distribution-Level Metrics for Demographic Paritycited by 4
- 2023Standardized Interpretable Fairness Measures for Continuous Risk Scorescited by 3
- 2025Enforcing Fair Predicted Scores on Intervals of Percentiles by Difference-of-Convex Constraintscited by 2
- 2026Investigating Bias and Fairness in Appearance-based Gaze Estimationcited by 1
- 2025Explainable post-training bias mitigation with distribution-based fairness metricscited by 0
- 2026Investigating Bias and Fairness in Appearance-based Gaze Estimation12 Apr 2026
- 2025Enforcing Fair Predicted Scores on Intervals of Percentiles by Difference-of-Convex Constraints18 May 2025
- 2025Explainable post-training bias mitigation with distribution-based fairness metrics1 Apr 2025
- 2023Standardized Interpretable Fairness Measures for Continuous Risk Scores22 Aug 2023
- 2023Retiring DeltaDP: New Distribution-Level Metrics for Demographic Parity31 Jan 2023