mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Choose Settings Carefully: Comparing Action Unit detection at Different Settings Using a Large-Scale Dataset

arXiv 2111.08324 ↗First posted 16 Nov 2021cs.CVcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we investigate the impact of some of the commonly used settings for (a) preprocessing face images, and (b) classification and training, on Action Unit (AU) detection performance and complexity. We use in our investigation a large-scale dataset, consisting of ~55K videos collected in the wild for participants watching commercial ads. The preprocessing settings include scaling the face to a fixed resolution, changing the color information (RGB to gray-scale), aligning the face, and cropping AU regions, while the classification and training settings include the kind of classifier (multi-label vs. binary) and the amount of data used for training models. To the best of our knowledge, no work had investigated the effect of those settings on AU detection. In our analysis we use CNNs as our baseline classification model.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Nov 2021.

Builds on

4 of 23 references.

References · 4

  1. 2018Deep Facial Expression Recognition: A Surveycited by 269
  2. 2018A Compact Embedding for Facial Expression Similaritycited by 41
  3. 2015EmoNets: Multimodal deep learning approaches for emotion recognition in videocited by 20
  4. 2018SchiNet: Automatic Estimation of Symptoms of Schizophrenia from Facial Behaviour Analysiscited by 16

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2.

2 papers.