mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Towards annotation of text worlds in a literary work

arXiv 2111.07256 ↗First posted 14 Nov 2021cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Literary texts are usually rich in meanings and their interpretation complicates corpus studies and automatic processing. There have been several attempts to create collections of literary texts with annotation of literary elements like the author's speech, characters, events, scenes etc. However, they resulted in small collections and standalone rules for annotation. The present article describes an experiment on lexical annotation of text worlds in a literary work and quantitative methods of their comparison. The experiment shows that for a well-agreed tag assignment annotation rules should be set much more strictly. However, if borders between text worlds and other elements are the result of a subjective interpretation, they should be modeled as fuzzy entities.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 0 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Nov 2021.

Builds on

0 of 16 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Not cited yet.