mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Explainable AI for Psychological Profiling from Digital Footprints: A Case Study of Big Five Personality Predictions from Spending Data

arXiv 2111.06908 ↗First posted 12 Nov 2021cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Every step we take in the digital world leaves behind a record of our behavior; a digital footprint. Research has suggested that algorithms can translate these digital footprints into accurate estimates of psychological characteristics, including personality traits, mental health or intelligence. The mechanisms by which AI generates these insights, however, often remain opaque. In this paper, we show how Explainable AI (XAI) can help domain experts and data subjects validate, question, and improve models that classify psychological traits from digital footprints. We elaborate on two popular XAI methods (rule extraction and counterfactual explanations) in the context of Big Five personality predictions (traits and facets) from financial transactions data (N = 6,408). First, we demonstrate how global rule extraction sheds light on the spending patterns identified by the model as most predictive for personality, and discuss how these rules can be used to explain, validate, and improve the model. Second, we implement local rule extraction to show that individuals are assigned to personality classes because of their unique financial behavior, and that there exists a positive link between the model's prediction confidence and the number of features that contributed to the prediction. Our experiments highlight the importance of both global and local XAI methods. By better understanding how predictive models work in general as well as how they derive an outcome for a particular person, XAI promotes accountability in a world in which AI impacts the lives of billions of people around the world.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Nov 2021.

Builds on

10 of 58 references.

References · 10

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  3. 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,086
  4. 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 970
  5. 2020Learning under Concept Drift: A Reviewcited by 470
  6. 2016Visualizing the Effects of Predictor Variables in Black Box Supervised Learning Modelscited by 212
  7. 2019Counterfactual Explanation Algorithms for Behavioral and Textual Datacited by 26
  8. 2020Explaining Data-Driven Decisions made by AI Systems: The Counterfactual Approachcited by 26
  9. 2016Enhancing Transparency and Control when Drawing Data-Driven Inferences about Individualscited by 2
  10. 2020Metafeatures-based Rule-Extraction for Classifiers on Behavioral and Textual Datacited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2.

2 papers.