mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Stationary Behavior of Constant Stepsize SGD Type Algorithms: An Asymptotic Characterization

arXiv 2111.06328 ↗First posted 11 Nov 2021cs.LGcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Stochastic approximation (SA) and stochastic gradient descent (SGD) algorithms are work-horses for modern machine learning algorithms. Their constant stepsize variants are preferred in practice due to fast convergence behavior. However, constant step stochastic iterative algorithms do not converge asymptotically to the optimal solution, but instead have a stationary distribution, which in general cannot be analytically characterized. In this work, we study the asymptotic behavior of the appropriately scaled stationary distribution, in the limit when the constant stepsize goes to zero. Specifically, we consider the following three settings: (1) SGD algorithms with smooth and strongly convex objective, (2) linear SA algorithms involving a Hurwitz matrix, and (3) nonlinear SA algorithms involving a contractive operator. When the iterate is scaled by 1/√α, where α is the constant stepsize, we show that the limiting scaled stationary distribution is a solution of an integral equation. Under a uniqueness assumption (which can be removed in certain settings) on this equation, we further characterize the limiting distribution as a Gaussian distribution whose covariance matrix is the unique solution of a suitable Lyapunov equation. For SA algorithms beyond these cases, our numerical experiments suggest that unlike central limit theorem type results: (1) the scaling factor need not be 1/√α, and (2) the limiting distribution need not be Gaussian. Based on the numerical study, we come up with a formula to determine the right scaling factor, and make insightful connection to the Euler-Maruyama discretization scheme for approximating stochastic differential equations.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Nov 2021.

Builds on

17 of 60 references.

References · 17

  1. 2016Optimization Methods for Large-Scale Machine Learningcited by 1,150
  2. 2018A Finite Time Analysis of Temporal Difference Learning With Linear Function Approximationcited by 229
  3. 2019Finite-Time Error Bounds For Linear Stochastic Approximation and TD Learningcited by 166
  4. 2018On the Convergence of Stochastic Gradient Descent with Adaptive Stepsizescited by 156
  5. 2015Stochastic modified equations and adaptive stochastic gradient algorithmscited by 142
  6. 2017Bridging the Gap between Constant Step Size Stochastic Gradient Descent and Markov Chainscited by 88
  7. 2020On the Almost Sure Convergence of Stochastic Gradient Descent in Non-Convex Problemscited by 80
  8. 2020SGD for Structured Nonconvex Functions: Learning Rates, Minibatching and Interpolationcited by 67
  9. 2019Convergence rates for the stochastic gradient descent method for non-convex objective functionscited by 66
  10. 2020An Analysis of Constant Step Size SGD in the Non-convex Regime: Asymptotic Normality and Biascited by 48
  11. 2019Improved Bounds for Discretization of Langevin Diffusions: Near-Optimal Rates without Convexitycited by 39
  12. 2019Linear Convergence of Adaptive Stochastic Gradient Descentcited by 29
5 more
  1. 2020Convergence of constant step stochastic gradient descent for non-smooth non-convex functionscited by 27
  2. 2020Analysis of Stochastic Gradient Descent in Continuous Timecited by 24
  3. 2021On Riemannian Stochastic Approximation Schemes with Fixed Step-Sizecited by 12
  4. 2017Stochastic Gradient Descent in Continuous Time: A Central Limit Theoremcited by 10
  5. 2020Logarithmic Heavy Traffic Error Bounds in Generalized Switch and Load Balancing Systemscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 0; 2024: 4; 2025: 1; 2026: 5.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area: