Machine Learning Guided 3D Image Recognition for Carbonate Pore and Mineral Volumes Determination
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Automated image processing algorithms can improve the quality, efficiency, and consistency of classifying the morphology of heterogeneous carbonate rock and can deal with a massive amount of data and images seamlessly. Geoscientists face difficulties in setting the direction of the optimum method for determining petrophysical properties from rock images, Micro-Computed Tomography (uCT), or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Most of the successful work is from the homogeneous rocks focusing on 2D images with less focus on 3D and requiring numerical simulation. Currently, image analysis methods converge to three approaches: image processing, artificial intelligence, and combined image processing with artificial intelligence. In this work, we propose two methods to determine the porosity from 3D uCT and MRI images: an image processing method with Image Resolution Optimized Gaussian Algorithm (IROGA); advanced image recognition method enabled by Machine Learning Difference of Gaussian Random Forest (MLDGRF). We have built reference 3D micro models and collected images for calibration of IROGA and MLDGRF methods. To evaluate the predictive capability of these calibrated approaches, we ran them on 3D uCT and MRI images of natural heterogeneous carbonate rock. We measured the porosity and lithology of the carbonate rock using three and two industry-standard ways, respectively, as reference values. Notably, IROGA and MLDGRF have produced porosity results with an accuracy of 96.2% and 97.1% on the training set and 91.7% and 94.4% on blind test validation, respectively, in comparison with the three experimental measurements. We measured limestone and pyrite reference values using two methods, X-ray powder diffraction, and grain density measurements. MLDGRF has produced lithology (limestone and Pyrite) volumes with 97.7% accuracy.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 92 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Nov 2021.
Builds on
2 of 92 references.
References · 2
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 1.
4 papers.
- 2021Morphology Decoder: A Machine Learning Guided 3D Vision Quantifying Heterogenous Rock Permeability for Planetary Surveillance and Robotic Functionscited by 2
- 2021Digital Rock Typing DRT Algorithm Formulation with Optimal Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 1
- 2021Deducing Optimal Classification Algorithm for Heterogeneous Fabriccited by 0
- 20223D Adapted Random Forest Vision (3DARFV) for Untangling Heterogeneous-Fabric Exceeding Deep Learning Semantic Segmentation Efficiency at the Utmost Accuracycited by 0
- 20223D Adapted Random Forest Vision (3DARFV) for Untangling Heterogeneous-Fabric Exceeding Deep Learning Semantic Segmentation Efficiency at the Utmost Accuracy23 Mar 2022
- 2021Digital Rock Typing DRT Algorithm Formulation with Optimal Supervised Semantic Segmentation30 Dec 2021
- 2021Morphology Decoder: A Machine Learning Guided 3D Vision Quantifying Heterogenous Rock Permeability for Planetary Surveillance and Robotic Functions26 Nov 2021
- 2021Deducing Optimal Classification Algorithm for Heterogeneous Fabric10 Nov 2021