Improving RNA Secondary Structure Design using Deep Reinforcement Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Rising costs in recent years of developing new drugs and treatments have led to extensive research in optimization techniques in biomolecular design. Currently, the most widely used approach in biomolecular design is directed evolution, which is a greedy hill-climbing algorithm that simulates biological evolution. In this paper, we propose a new benchmark of applying reinforcement learning to RNA sequence design, in which the objective function is defined to be the free energy in the sequence's secondary structure. In addition to experimenting with the vanilla implementations of each reinforcement learning algorithm from standard libraries, we analyze variants of each algorithm in which we modify the algorithm's reward function and tune the model's hyperparameters. We show results of the ablation analysis that we do for these algorithms, as well as graphs indicating the algorithm's performance across batches and its ability to search the possible space of RNA sequences. We find that our DQN algorithm performs by far the best in this setting, contrasting with, in which PPO performs the best among all tested algorithms. Our results should be of interest to those in the biomolecular design community and should serve as a baseline for future experiments involving machine learning in molecule design.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Nov 2021.
Builds on
6 of 27 references.
References · 6
- 2015Prioritized Experience Replaycited by 1,070
- 2018MolGAN: An implicit generative model for small molecular graphscited by 392
- 2018Optimization of Molecules via Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 199
- 2017Application of generative autoencoder in de novo molecular designcited by 32
- 2017Generating and designing DNA with deep generative modelscited by 30
- 2015Bayesian Optimization for Synthetic Gene Designcited by 21
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2.
2 papers.