mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

On the Limits of Design: What Are the Conceptual Constraints on Designing Artificial Intelligence for Social Good?

arXiv 2111.04165 ↗First posted 7 Nov 2021econ.GN cs.AI cs.CYcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Artificial intelligence AI can bring substantial benefits to society by helping to reduce costs, increase efficiency and enable new solutions to complex problems. Using Floridi's notion of how to design the 'infosphere' as a starting point, in this chapter I consider the question: what are the limits of design, i.e. what are the conceptual constraints on designing AI for social good? The main argument of this chapter is that while design is a useful conceptual tool to shape technologies and societies, collective efforts towards designing future societies are constrained by both internal and external factors. Internal constraints on design are discussed by evoking Hardin's thought experiment regarding 'the Tragedy of the Commons'. Further, Hayek's classical distinction between 'cosmos' and 'taxis' is used to demarcate external constraints on design. Finally, five design principles are presented which are aimed at helping policymakers manage the internal and external constraints on design. A successful approach to designing future societies needs to account for the emergent properties of complex systems by allowing space for serendipity and socio-technological coevolution.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Nov 2021.

Builds on

2 of 64 references.

References · 2

  1. 2019The role of artificial intelligence in achieving the Sustainable Development Goalscited by 100
  2. 2019Understanding artificial intelligence ethics and safetycited by 68

Built on by

Not cited yet.