Towards Designing Optimal Sensing Matrices for Generalized Linear Inverse Problems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We consider an inverse problem y= f(Ax), where x∈ℝn is the signal of interest, A is the sensing matrix, f is a nonlinear function and y ∈ ℝm is the measurement vector. In many applications, we have some level of freedom to design the sensing matrix A, and in such circumstances we could optimize A to achieve better reconstruction performance. As a first step towards optimal design, it is important to understand the impact of the sensing matrix on the difficulty of recovering x from y. In this paper, we study the performance of one of the most successful recovery methods, i.e., the expectation propagation (EP) algorithm. We define a notion of spikiness for the spectrum of bmmathbfA and show the importance of this measure for the performance of EP. We show that whether a spikier spectrum can hurt or help the recovery performance depends on f. Based on our framework, we are able to show that, in phase-retrieval problems, matrices with spikier spectrums are better for EP, while in 1-bit compressed sensing problems, less spiky spectrums lead to better performance. Our results unify and substantially generalize existing results that compare Gaussian and orthogonal matrices, and provide a platform towards designing optimal sensing systems.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 80 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Nov 2021.
Builds on
24 of 80 references.
References · 24
- 2013Expectation Propagation for approximate Bayesian inferencecited by 172
- 2014Phase Retrieval via Wirtinger Flow: Theory and Algorithmscited by 123
- 2017Optimal Errors and Phase Transitions in High-Dimensional Generalized Linear Modelscited by 115
- 2018A modern maximum-likelihood theory for high-dimensional logistic regressioncited by 79
- 2018The committee machine: Computational to statistical gaps in learning a two-layers neural networkcited by 58
- 2015Solving Random Quadratic Systems of Equations Is Nearly as Easy as Solving Linear Systemscited by 50
- 2021A unifying tutorial on Approximate Message Passingcited by 49
- 2017Fundamental Limits of Weak Recovery with Applications to Phase Retrievalcited by 39
- 2020Phase retrieval in high dimensions: Statistical and computational phase transitionscited by 39
- 2020The estimation error of general first order methodscited by 33
- 2020Approximate Message Passing algorithms for rotationally invariant matricescited by 31
- 2016Solving Systems of Random Quadratic Equations via Truncated Amplitude Flowcited by 28
12 more
- 2017Phase Transitions of Spectral Initialization for High-Dimensional Nonconvex Estimationcited by 26
- 2016PhaseMax: Convex Phase Retrieval via Basis Pursuitcited by 25
- 2020Approximate Message Passing with Spectral Initialization for Generalized Linear Modelscited by 22
- 2016Finite Sample Analysis of Approximate Message Passing Algorithmscited by 20
- 2019Exact asymptotics for phase retrieval and compressed sensing with random generative priorscited by 20
- 2019Algorithmic Analysis and Statistical Estimation of SLOPE via Approximate Message Passingcited by 14
- 2021PCA Initialization for Approximate Message Passing in Rotationally Invariant Modelscited by 14
- 2017Inference in Deep Networks in High Dimensionscited by 12
- 2016Phase Retrieval Meets Statistical Learning Theory: A Flexible Convex Relaxationcited by 11
- 2016Expectation Consistent Approximate Inference: Generalizations and Convergencecited by 6
- 2016Reshaped Wirtinger Flow and Incremental Algorithm for Solving Quadratic System of Equationscited by 4
- 2019RLS Precoding for Massive MIMO Systems with Nonlinear Front-Endcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.