Symmetry-Aware Autoencoders: s-PCA and s-nlPCA
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Nonlinear principal component analysis (NLPCA) via autoencoders has attracted attention in the dynamical systems community due to its larger compression rate when compared to linear principal component analysis (PCA). These model reduction methods experience an increase in the dimensionality of the latent space when applied to datasets that exhibit invariant samples due to the presence of symmetries. In this study, we introduce a novel machine learning embedding for autoencoders, which uses Siamese networks and spatial transformer networks to account for discrete and continuous symmetries, respectively. The Siamese branches autonomously find a fundamental domain to which all samples are transformed, without introducing human bias. The spatial transformer network discovers the optimal slicing template for continuous translations so that invariant samples are aligned in the homogeneous direction. Thus, the proposed symmetry-aware autoencoder is invariant to predetermined input transformations. This embedding can be employed with both linear and nonlinear reduction methods, which we term symmetry-aware PCA (s-PCA) and symmetry-aware NLPCA (s-NLPCA). We apply the proposed framework to the Kolmogorov flow to showcase the capabilities for a system exhibiting both a continuous symmetry as well as discrete symmetries.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Nov 2021.
Builds on
5 of 33 references.
References · 5
- 2015Spatial Transformer Networkscited by 1,423
- 2017Deep learning for universal linear embeddings of nonlinear dynamicscited by 491
- 2017Linearly-Recurrent Autoencoder Networks for Learning Dynamicscited by 142
- 2019Deep learning to discover and predict dynamics on an inertial manifoldcited by 42
- 2018From Principal Subspaces to Principal Components with Linear Autoencoderscited by 38
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 3; 2025: 2.
8 papers.
- 2024Recent Advances on Machine Learning for Computational Fluid Dynamics: A Surveycited by 27
- 2022Data-driven low-dimensional dynamic model of Kolmogorov flowcited by 9
- 2024Decoder Decomposition for the Analysis of the Latent Space of Nonlinear Autoencoders With Wind-Tunnel Experimental Datacited by 3
- 2024Decoding complexity: how machine learning is redefining scientific discoverycited by 3
- 2023Building symmetries into data-driven manifold dynamics models for complex flows: application to two-dimensional Kolmogorov flowcited by 2
- 2025Convolutional autoencoders for the reconstruction of three-dimensional interfacial multiphase flowscited by 2
- 2023An autoencoder compression approach for accelerating large-scale inverse problemscited by 1
- 2025UP-dROM : Uncertainty-Aware and Parametrised dynamic Reduced-Order Model, application to unsteady flowscited by 0
- 2025Convolutional autoencoders for the reconstruction of three-dimensional interfacial multiphase flows6 Aug 2025
- 2025UP-dROM : Uncertainty-Aware and Parametrised dynamic Reduced-Order Model, application to unsteady flows29 Mar 2025
- 2024Recent Advances on Machine Learning for Computational Fluid Dynamics: A Survey22 Aug 2024
- 2024Decoding complexity: how machine learning is redefining scientific discovery7 May 2024
- 2024Decoder Decomposition for the Analysis of the Latent Space of Nonlinear Autoencoders With Wind-Tunnel Experimental Data25 Apr 2024
- 2023Building symmetries into data-driven manifold dynamics models for complex flows: application to two-dimensional Kolmogorov flow15 Dec 2023
- 2023An autoencoder compression approach for accelerating large-scale inverse problems10 Apr 2023
- 2022Data-driven low-dimensional dynamic model of Kolmogorov flow29 Oct 2022