mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Instructive artificial intelligence (AI) for human training, assistance, and explainability

arXiv 2111.01726 ↗First posted 2 Nov 2021cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We propose a novel approach to explainable AI (XAI) based on the concept of "instruction" from neural networks. In this case study, we demonstrate how a superhuman neural network might instruct human trainees as an alternative to traditional approaches to XAI. Specifically, an AI examines human actions and calculates variations on the human strategy that lead to better performance. Experiments with a JHU/APL-developed AI player for the cooperative card game Hanabi suggest this technique makes unique contributions to explainability while improving human performance. One area of focus for Instructive AI is in the significant discrepancies that can arise between a human's actual strategy and the strategy they profess to use. This inaccurate self-assessment presents a barrier for XAI, since explanations of an AI's strategy may not be properly understood or implemented by human recipients. We have developed and are testing a novel, Instructive AI approach that estimates human strategy by observing human actions. With neural networks, this allows a direct calculation of the changes in weights needed to improve the human strategy to better emulate a more successful AI. Subjected to constraints (e.g. sparsity) these weight changes can be interpreted as recommended changes to human strategy (e.g. "value A more, and value B less"). Instruction from AI such as this functions both to help humans perform better at tasks, but also to better understand, anticipate, and correct the actions of an AI. Results will be presented on AI instruction's ability to improve human decision-making and human-AI teaming in Hanabi.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Nov 2021.

Builds on

11 of 17 references.

References · 11

  1. 2018A Survey Of Methods For Explaining Black Box Modelscited by 973
  2. 2017Rainbow: Combining Improvements in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 786
  3. 2017Mastering Chess and Shogi by Self-Play with a General Reinforcement Learning Algorithmcited by 734
  4. 2018Towards Robust Interpretability with Self-Explaining Neural Networkscited by 505
  5. 2020"Other-Play" for Zero-Shot Coordinationcited by 198
  6. 2019The Hanabi Challenge: A New Frontier for AI Researchcited by 197
  7. 2020Explainable Artificial Intelligence: a Systematic Reviewcited by 79
  8. 2019Simplified Action Decoder for Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 48
  9. 2021Evaluation of Human-AI Teams for Learned and Rule-Based Agents in Hanabicited by 40
  10. 2019Enhancing Explainability of Neural Networks through Architecture Constraintscited by 29
  11. 2018Interpreting Neural Network Judgments via Minimal, Stable, and Symbolic Correctionscited by 19

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.

2 papers.