A comparison of mixed-variables Bayesian optimization approaches
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Most real optimization problems are defined over a mixed search space where the variables are both discrete and continuous. In engineering applications, the objective function is typically calculated with a numerically costly black-box simulation.General mixed and costly optimization problems are therefore of a great practical interest, yet their resolution remains in a large part an open scientific question. In this article, costly mixed problems are approached through Gaussian processes where the discrete variables are relaxed into continuous latent variables. The continuous space is more easily harvested by classical Bayesian optimization techniques than a mixed space would. Discrete variables are recovered either subsequently to the continuous optimization, or simultaneously with an additional continuous-discrete compatibility constraint that is handled with augmented Lagrangians. Several possible implementations of such Bayesian mixed optimizers are compared. In particular, the reformulation of the problem with continuous latent variables is put in competition with searches working directly in the mixed space. Among the algorithms involving latent variables and an augmented Lagrangian, a particular attention is devoted to the Lagrange multipliers for which a local and a global estimation techniques are studied. The comparisons are based on the repeated optimization of three analytical functions and a beam design problem.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Oct 2021.
Builds on
10 of 38 references.
References · 10
- 2018A Tutorial on Bayesian Optimizationcited by 734
- 2013Bayesian Optimization in a Billion Dimensions via Random Embeddingscited by 178
- 2018Maximizing acquisition functions for Bayesian optimizationcited by 113
- 2019Bayesian Optimization for Materials Design with Mixed Quantitative and Qualitative Variablescited by 64
- 2018A Latent Variable Approach to Gaussian Process Modeling with Qualitative and Quantitative Factorscited by 30
- 2016Bayesian optimization under mixed constraints with a slack-variable augmented Lagrangiancited by 29
- 2018Group kernels for Gaussian process metamodels with categorical inputscited by 22
- 2017mlrMBO: A Modular Framework for Model-Based Optimization of Expensive Black-Box Functionscited by 16
- 2018Efficient global optimization of constrained mixed variable problemscited by 11
- 2021Revisiting Bayesian Optimization in the light of the COCO benchmarkcited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 3; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
6 papers.
- 2023SMT 2.0: A Surrogate Modeling Toolbox with a focus on Hierarchical and Mixed Variables Gaussian Processescited by 27
- 2022A mixed-categorical correlation kernel for Gaussian processcited by 19
- 2022BaCO: A Fast and Portable Bayesian Compiler Optimization Frameworkcited by 11
- 2023High-dimensional mixed-categorical Gaussian processes with application to multidisciplinary design optimization for a green aircraftcited by 8
- 2023Mastering the exploration-exploitation trade-off in Bayesian Optimizationcited by 3
- 2025CatBOX: A Categorical-Continuous Bayesian Optimization with Spectral Mixture Kernels for Accelerated Catalysis Experimentscited by 0
- 2025CatBOX: A Categorical-Continuous Bayesian Optimization with Spectral Mixture Kernels for Accelerated Catalysis Experiments23 May 2025
- 2023High-dimensional mixed-categorical Gaussian processes with application to multidisciplinary design optimization for a green aircraft10 Nov 2023
- 2023SMT 2.0: A Surrogate Modeling Toolbox with a focus on Hierarchical and Mixed Variables Gaussian Processes23 May 2023
- 2023Mastering the exploration-exploitation trade-off in Bayesian Optimization15 May 2023
- 2022BaCO: A Fast and Portable Bayesian Compiler Optimization Framework1 Dec 2022
- 2022A mixed-categorical correlation kernel for Gaussian process15 Nov 2022