mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Correlation between image quality metrics of magnetic resonance images and the neural network segmentation accuracy

arXiv 2111.01093 ↗First posted 1 Nov 2021eess.IV cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep neural networks with multilevel connections process input data in complex ways to learn the information.A networks learning efficiency depends not only on the complex neural network architecture but also on the input training images.Medical image segmentation with deep neural networks for skull stripping or tumor segmentation from magnetic resonance images enables learning both global and local features of the images.Though medical images are collected in a controlled environment,there may be artifacts or equipment based variance that cause inherent bias in the input set.In this study, we investigated the correlation between the image quality metrics of MR images with the neural network segmentation accuracy.For that we have used the 3D DenseNet architecture and let the network trained on the same input but applying different methodologies to select the training data set based on the IQM values.The difference in the segmentation accuracy between models based on the random training inputs with IQM based training inputs shed light on the role of image quality metrics on segmentation accuracy.By running the image quality metrics to choose the training inputs,further we may tune the learning efficiency of the network and the segmentation accuracy.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Nov 2021.

Builds on

15 of 49 references.

References · 15

  1. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  2. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  3. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  4. 2018UNet++: A Nested U-Net Architecture for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 1,518
  5. 20163D U-Net: Learning Dense Volumetric Segmentation from Sparse Annotationcited by 1,471
  6. 2019Automated brain extraction of multi-sequence MRI using artificial neural networkscited by 133
  7. 2016Understanding How Image Quality Affects Deep Neural Networkscited by 118
  8. 2020Just How Toxic is Data Poisoning? A Unified Benchmark for Backdoor and Data Poisoning Attackscited by 109
  9. 2015A Sensitivity Analysis of (and Practitioners' Guide to) Convolutional Neural Networks for Sentence Classificationcited by 92
  10. 2017Universal Adversarial Perturbations Against Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 92
  11. 2018HyperDense-Net: A hyper-densely connected CNN for multi-modal image segmentationcited by 66
  12. 2017Adversarial Examples for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 33
3 more
  1. 2018MRI Tumor Segmentation with Densely Connected 3D CNNcited by 16
  2. 2020MRQy: An Open-Source Tool for Quality Control of MR Imaging Datacited by 12
  3. 2016End-to-end learning of brain tissue segmentation from imperfect labelingcited by 9

Built on by

Not cited yet.