mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Learning Feasibility to Imitate Demonstrators with Different Dynamics

arXiv 2110.15142 ↗First posted 28 Oct 2021cs.RO cs.LGcited by 10

On the map: Offline RL and imitation learning from data → Imitation learning methods

Abstract (arXiv)

The goal of learning from demonstrations is to learn a policy for an agent (imitator) by mimicking the behavior in the demonstrations. Prior works on learning from demonstrations assume that the demonstrations are collected by a demonstrator that has the same dynamics as the imitator. However, in many real-world applications, this assumption is limiting -- to improve the problem of lack of data in robotics, we would like to be able to leverage demonstrations collected from agents with different dynamics. This can be challenging as the demonstrations might not even be feasible for the imitator. Our insight is that we can learn a feasibility metric that captures the likelihood of a demonstration being feasible by the imitator. We develop a feasibility MDP (f-MDP) and derive the feasibility score by learning an optimal policy in the f-MDP. Our proposed feasibility measure encourages the imitator to learn from more informative demonstrations, and disregard the far from feasible demonstrations. Our experiments on four simulated environments and on a real robot show that the policy learned with our approach achieves a higher expected return than prior works. We show the videos of the real robot arm experiments on our website (https://sites.google.com/view/learning-feasibility).

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Imitation learning methods, one of 13 directions in Offline RL and imitation learning from data. Builds on 17 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Oct 2021.

Builds on

17 of 32 references.

Closest ancestors · 7

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2021Learning from Imperfect Demonstrations from Agents with Varying Dynamics10 Mar
  2. 2020State-only Imitation with Transition Dynamics Mismatch27 Feb
  3. 2019State Alignment-based Imitation Learning21 Nov
  4. 2019Provably Efficient Imitation Learning from Observation Alone27 May
  5. 2019Imitation Learning from Imperfect Demonstration27 Jan
  6. 2018Generative Adversarial Imitation from Observation17 Jul
  7. 2018Behavioral Cloning from Observation4 May

Other references · 10

  1. 2015Trust Region Policy Optimizationcited by 2,580
  2. 2016Generative Adversarial Imitation Learningcited by 1,597
  3. 2017Domain Randomization for Transferring Deep Neural Networks from Simulation to the Real Worldcited by 1,498
  4. 2017Sim-to-Real Transfer of Robotic Control with Dynamics Randomizationcited by 672
  5. 2016Guided Cost Learning: Deep Inverse Optimal Control via Policy Optimizationcited by 406
  6. 2020State-Only Imitation Learning for Dexterous Manipulationcited by 91
  7. 2018Multiple Interactions Made Easy (MIME): Large Scale Demonstrations Data for Imitationcited by 76
  8. 2019DeceptionNet: Network-Driven Domain Randomizationcited by 43
  9. 2020Learning Cross-Domain Correspondence for Control with Dynamics Cycle-Consistencycited by 43
  10. 2018Adversarial Imitation via Variational Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 36

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 4; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

10 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025When a Robot is More Capable than a Human: Learning from Constrained Demonstrators
  2. 2022Eliciting Compatible Demonstrations for Multi-Human Imitation Learning
  3. 2025Uncertainty-Based Smooth Policy Regularisation for Reinforcement Learning with Few Demonstrations
  4. 2022Imitation Learning by Estimating Expertise of Demonstrators
  5. 2022Robust Imitation of a Few Demonstrations with a Backwards Model
  6. 2021Cross-domain Imitation from Observations
  7. 2019Watch, Try, Learn: Meta-Learning from Demonstrations and Reward
  8. 2019To Follow or not to Follow: Selective Imitation Learning from Observations