On the explainability of hospitalization prediction on a large COVID-19 patient dataset
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We develop various AI models to predict hospitalization on a large (over 110k) cohort of COVID-19 positive-tested US patients, sourced from March 2020 to February 2021. Models range from Random Forest to Neural Network (NN) and Time Convolutional NN, where combination of the data modalities (tabular and time dependent) are performed at different stages (early vs. model fusion). Despite high data unbalance, the models reach average precision 0.96-0.98 (0.75-0.85), recall 0.96-0.98 (0.74-0.85), and F1-score 0.97-0.98 (0.79-0.83) on the non-hospitalized (or hospitalized) class. Performances do not significantly drop even when selected lists of features are removed to study model adaptability to different scenarios. However, a systematic study of the SHAP feature importance values for the developed models in the different scenarios shows a large variability across models and use cases. This calls for even more complete studies on several explainability methods before their adoption in high-stakes scenarios.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Oct 2021.
Builds on
4 of 24 references.
References · 4
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2017Interpretation of Neural Networks is Fragilecited by 444
- 2017Right for the Right Reasons: Training Differentiable Models by Constraining their Explanationscited by 294
- 2018Auto-Keras: An Efficient Neural Architecture Search Systemcited by 171
Built on by
Not cited yet.