mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Can Linguistic Distance help Language Classification? Assessing Hawrami-Zaza and Kurmanji-Sorani

arXiv 2110.14398 ↗First posted 27 Oct 2021cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

To consider Hawrami and Zaza (Zazaki) standalone languages or dialects of a language have been discussed and debated for a while among linguists active in studying Iranian languages. The question of whether those languages/dialects belong to the Kurdish language or if they are independent descendants of Iranian languages was answered by MacKenzie (1961). However, a majority of people who speak the dialects are against that answer. Their disapproval mainly seems to be based on the sociological, cultural, and historical relationship among the speakers of the dialects. While the case of Hawrami and Zaza has remained unexplored and under-examined, an almost unanimous agreement exists about the classification of Kurmanji and Sorani as Kurdish dialects. The related studies to address the mentioned cases are primarily qualitative. However, computational linguistics could approach the question from a quantitative perspective. In this research, we look into three questions from a linguistic distance point of view. First, how similar or dissimilar Hawrami and Zaza are, considering no common geographical coexistence between the two. Second, what about Kurmanji and Sorani that have geographical overlap. Finally, what is the distance among all these dialects, pair by pair? We base our computation on phonetic presentations of these dialects (languages), and we calculate various linguistic distances among the pairs. We analyze the data and discuss the results to conclude.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 0 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Oct 2021.

Builds on

0 of 18 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Not cited yet.