mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Data-driven decomposition of brain dynamics with principal component analysis in different types of head impacts

arXiv 2110.14116 ↗First posted 27 Oct 2021q-bio.QM cs.LG eess.SPcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Strain and strain rate are effective traumatic brain injury predictors. Kinematics-based models estimating these metrics suffer from significant different distributions of both kinematics and the injury metrics across head impact types. To address this, previous studies focus on the kinematics but not the injury metrics. We have previously shown the kinematic features vary largely across head impact types, resulting in different patterns of brain deformation. This study analyzes the spatial distribution of brain deformation and applies principal component analysis (PCA) to extract the representative patterns of injury metrics (maximum principal strain (MPS), MPS rate (MPSR) and MPSXMPSR) in four impact types (simulation, football, mixed martial arts and car crashes). We apply PCA to decompose the patterns of the injury metrics for all impacts in each impact type, and investigate the distributions among brain regions using the first principal component (PC1). Furthermore, we developed a deep learning head model (DLHM) to predict PC1 and then inverse-transform to predict for all brain elements. PC1 explained >80% variance on the datasets. Based on PC1 coefficients, the corpus callosum and midbrain exhibit high variance on all datasets. We found MPSXMPSR the most sensitive metric on which the top 5% of severe impacts further deviates from the mean and there is a higher variance among the severe impacts. Finally, the DLHM reached mean absolute errors of <0.018 for MPS, <3.7 (1/s) for MPSR and <1.1 (1/s) for MPSXMPSR, much smaller than the injury thresholds. The brain injury metric in a dataset can be decomposed into mean components and PC1 with high explained variance. The brain dynamics decomposition enables better interpretation of the patterns in brain injury metrics and the sensitivity of brain injury metrics across impact types. The decomposition also reduces the dimensionality of DLHM.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 72 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Oct 2021.

Builds on

6 of 72 references.

References · 6

  1. 2020Deep Learning Head Model for Real-time Estimation of Entire Brain Deformation in Concussioncited by 10
  2. 2020Validation and Comparison of Instrumented Mouthguards for Measuring Head Kinematics and Assessing Brain Deformation in Football Impactscited by 8
  3. 2020Relationship between brain injury criteria and brain strain across different types of head impacts can be differentcited by 8
  4. 2021Predictive Factors of Kinematics in Traumatic Brain Injury from Head Impacts Based on Statistical Interpretationcited by 8
  5. 2021Boost AI Power: Data Augmentation Strategies with unlabelled Data and Conformal Prediction, a Case in Alternative Herbal Medicine Discrimination with Electronic Nosecited by 6
  6. 2021Rapidly and accurately estimating brain strain and strain rate across head impact types with transfer learning and data fusioncited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1.

2 papers.