mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Deep Integrated Pipeline of Segmentation Guided Classification of Breast Cancer from Ultrasound Images

arXiv 2110.14013 ↗First posted 26 Oct 2021eess.IV cs.CV cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Breast cancer has become a symbol of tremendous concern in the modern world, as it is one of the major causes of cancer mortality worldwide. In this regard, breast ultrasonography images are frequently utilized by doctors to diagnose breast cancer at an early stage. However, the complex artifacts and heavily noised breast ultrasonography images make diagnosis a great challenge. Furthermore, the ever-increasing number of patients being screened for breast cancer necessitates the use of automated end-to-end technology for highly accurate diagnosis at a low cost and in a short time. In this concern, to develop an end-to-end integrated pipeline for breast ultrasonography image classification, we conducted an exhaustive analysis of image preprocessing methods such as K Means++ and SLIC, as well as four transfer learning models such as VGG16, VGG19, DenseNet121, and ResNet50. With a Dice-coefficient score of 63.4 in the segmentation stage and accuracy and an F1-Score (Benign) of 73.72 percent and 78.92 percent in the classification stage, the combination of SLIC, UNET, and VGG16 outperformed all other integrated combinations. Finally, we have proposed an end to end integrated automated pipelining framework which includes preprocessing with SLIC to capture super-pixel features from the complex artifact of ultrasonography images, complementing semantic segmentation with modified U-Net, leading to breast tumor classification using a transfer learning approach with a pre-trained VGG16 and a densely connected neural network. The proposed automated pipeline can be effectively implemented to assist medical practitioners in making more accurate and timely diagnoses of breast cancer.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 75 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Oct 2021.

Builds on

13 of 75 references.

References · 13

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
  3. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  4. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
  5. 2020A survey of loss functions for semantic segmentationcited by 217
  6. 2017Deep Learning for Medical Image Processing: Overview, Challenges and Futurecited by 104
  7. 2020Deep Learning for Neuroimaging-based Diagnosis and Rehabilitation of Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Reviewcited by 26
  8. 2019Going Deep in Medical Image Analysis: Concepts, Methods, Challenges and Future Directionscited by 24
  9. 2020Automated Detection and Forecasting of COVID-19 using Deep Learning Techniques: A Reviewcited by 21
  10. 2017Convolutional Neural Networks for Histopathology Image Classification: Training vs. Using Pre-Trained Networkscited by 10
  11. 2021Applications of Deep Learning Techniques for Automated Multiple Sclerosis Detection Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Reviewcited by 10
  12. 2018SD-CNN: a Shallow-Deep CNN for Improved Breast Cancer Diagnosiscited by 4
1 more
  1. 2019Breast Cancer Classification with Ultrasound Images Based on SLICcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

2 papers.