mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Evolutionary Optimization of High-Coverage Budgeted Classifiers

arXiv 2110.13067 ↗First posted 25 Oct 2021cs.NE cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Classifiers are often utilized in time-constrained settings where labels must be assigned to inputs quickly. To address these scenarios, budgeted multi-stage classifiers (MSC) process inputs through a sequence of partial feature acquisition and evaluation steps with early-exit options until a confident prediction can be made. This allows for fast evaluation that can prevent expensive, unnecessary feature acquisition in time-critical instances. However, performance of MSCs is highly sensitive to several design aspects -- making optimization of these systems an important but difficult problem. To approximate an initially intractable combinatorial problem, current approaches to MSC configuration rely on well-behaved surrogate loss functions accounting for two primary objectives (processing cost, error). These approaches have proven useful in many scenarios but are limited by analytic constraints (convexity, smoothness, etc.) and do not manage additional performance objectives. Notably, such methods do not explicitly account for an important aspect of real-time detection systems -- the ratio of "accepted" predictions satisfying some confidence criterion imposed by a risk-averse monitor. This paper proposes a problem-specific genetic algorithm, EMSCO, that incorporates a terminal reject option for indecisive predictions and treats MSC design as an evolutionary optimization problem with distinct objectives (accuracy, cost, coverage). The algorithm's design emphasizes Pareto efficiency while respecting a notion of aggregated performance via a unique scalarization. Experiments are conducted to demonstrate EMSCO's ability to find global optima in a variety of Theta(k^n) solution spaces, and multiple experiments show EMSCO is competitive with alternative budgeted approaches.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Oct 2021.

Builds on

7 of 37 references.

References · 7

  1. 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,479
  2. 2017Selective Classification for Deep Neural Networkscited by 799
  3. 2019Multi-Stage Document Ranking with BERTcited by 200
  4. 2019Classification with Costly Features as a Sequential Decision-Making Problemcited by 23
  5. 2020Trees, forests, and impurity-based variable importancecited by 16
  6. 2016Pruning Random Forests for Prediction on a Budgetcited by 14
  7. 2019Controlling Costs: Feature Selection on a Budgetcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Greedy Is a Strong Default: Agents as Iterative Optimizers
  2. 2024EERO: Early Exit with Reject Option for Efficient Classification with limited budget
  3. 2026A Feature-Driven Framework for Software Fault Prediction
  4. 2025Multi-objective Bayesian Optimization With Mixed-categorical Design Variables for Expensive-to-evaluate Aeronautical Applications
  5. 2025Decoupled Multi-Predictor Optimization for Inference-Efficient Model Tuning
  6. 2025Regularized infill criteria for multi-objective Bayesian optimization with application to aircraft design
  7. 2023Evaluation of Active Feature Acquisition Methods for Static Feature Settings
  8. 2024Evolutionary Pre-Prompt Optimization for Mathematical Reasoning