Complete Agent-driven Model-based System Testing for Autonomous Systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this position paper, a novel approach to testing complex autonomous transportation systems (ATS) in the automotive, avionic, and railway domains is described. It is intended to mitigate some of the most critical problems regarding verification and validation (V&V) effort for ATS. V&V is known to become infeasible for complex ATS, when using conventional methods only. The approach advocated here uses complete testing methods on the module level, because these establish formal proofs for the logical correctness of the software. Having established logical correctness, system-level tests are performed in simulated cloud environments and on the target system. To give evidence that 'sufficiently many' system tests have been performed with the target system, a formally justified coverage criterion is introduced. To optimise the execution of very large system test suites, we advocate an online testing approach where multiple tests are executed in parallel, and test steps are identified on-the-fly. The coordination and optimisation of these executions is achieved by an agent-based approach. Each aspect of the testing approach advocated here is shown to either be consistent with existing standards for development and V&V of safety-critical transportation systems, or it is justified why it should become acceptable in future revisions of the applicable standards.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Oct 2021.
Builds on
5 of 58 references.
References · 5
- 2019An Agency-Directed Approach to Test Generation for Simulation-based Autonomous Vehicle Verificationcited by 5
- 2016Intelligent Agent-Based Stimulation for Testing Robotic Software in Human-Robot Interactionscited by 4
- 2016Model-Based Testing, Using Belief-Desire-Intentions Agents, of Control Code for Robots in Collaborative Human-Robot Interactionscited by 2
- 2016Model-based Test Generation for Robotic Software: Automata versus Belief-Desire-Intention Agentscited by 2
- 2020Agent-Based Software Testing: A Definition and Systematic Mapping Studycited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.
1 paper.
- 2022DIRA: Dynamic Domain Incremental Regularised Adaptationcited by 1
- 2022DIRA: Dynamic Domain Incremental Regularised Adaptation30 Apr 2022