mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ListReader: Extracting List-form Answers for Opinion Questions

arXiv 2110.11692 ↗First posted 22 Oct 2021cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Question answering (QA) is a high-level ability of natural language processing. Most extractive ma-chine reading comprehension models focus on factoid questions (e.g., who, when, where) and restrict the output answer as a short and continuous span in the original passage. However, in real-world scenarios, many questions are non-factoid (e.g., how, why) and their answers are organized in the list format that contains multiple non-contiguous spans. Naturally, existing extractive models are by design unable to answer such questions. To address this issue, this paper proposes ListReader, a neural ex-tractive QA model for list-form answer. In addition to learning the alignment between the question and content, we introduce a heterogeneous graph neural network to explicitly capture the associations among candidate segments. Moreover, our model adopts a co-extraction setting that can extract either span- or sentence-level answers, allowing better applicability. Two large-scale datasets of different languages are constructed to support this study. Experimental results show that our model considerably outperforms various strong baselines. Further discussions provide an intuitive understanding of how our model works and where the performance gain comes from.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Oct 2021.

Builds on

19 of 25 references.

References · 19

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
  4. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
  5. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,115
  6. 2019XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understandingcited by 2,801
  7. 2019ALBERT: A Lite BERT for Self-supervised Learning of Language Representationscited by 2,772
  8. 2018Know What You Don't Know: Unanswerable Questions for SQuADcited by 1,538
  9. 2015Teaching Machines to Read and Comprehendcited by 1,039
  10. 2017RACE: Large-scale ReAding Comprehension Dataset From Examinationscited by 851
  11. 2017The NarrativeQA Reading Comprehension Challengecited by 590
  12. 2016Bidirectional Attention Flow for Machine Comprehensioncited by 278
7 more
  1. 2018QANet: Combining Local Convolution with Global Self-Attention for Reading Comprehensioncited by 164
  2. 2015The Goldilocks Principle: Reading Children's Books with Explicit Memory Representationscited by 108
  3. 2018What Makes Reading Comprehension Questions Easier?cited by 59
  4. 2019A Multi-Type Multi-Span Network for Reading Comprehension that Requires Discrete Reasoningcited by 41
  5. 2018MCScript: A Novel Dataset for Assessing Machine Comprehension Using Script Knowledgecited by 30
  6. 2019A Simple and Effective Model for Answering Multi-span Questionscited by 13
  7. 2020Enhancing Answer Boundary Detection for Multilingual Machine Reading Comprehensioncited by 11

Built on by

Not cited yet.