mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

How to Fairly Allocate Easy and Difficult Chores

arXiv 2110.11285 ↗First posted 21 Oct 2021cs.GTcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A major open question in fair allocation of indivisible items is whether there always exists an allocation of chores that is Pareto optimal (PO) and envy-free up to one item (EF1). We answer this question affirmatively for the natural class of bivalued utilities, where each agent partitions the chores into easy and difficult ones, and has cost p > 1 for chores that are difficult for her and cost 1 for chores that are easy for her. Such an allocation can be found in polynomial time using an algorithm based on the Fisher market. We also show that for a slightly broader class of utilities, where each agent i can have a potentially different integer pi, an allocation that is maximin share fair (MMS) always exists and can be computed in polynomial time, provided that each pi is an integer. Our MMS arguments also hold when allocating goods instead of chores, and extend to another natural class of utilities, namely weakly lexicographic utilities.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 21 Oct 2021.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

3 papers.