mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Lottery Tickets with Nonzero Biases

arXiv 2110.11150 ↗First posted 21 Oct 2021cs.LG cs.AIcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The strong lottery ticket hypothesis holds the promise that pruning randomly initialized deep neural networks could offer a computationally efficient alternative to deep learning with stochastic gradient descent. Common parameter initialization schemes and existence proofs, however, are focused on networks with zero biases, thus foregoing the potential universal approximation property of pruning. To fill this gap, we extend multiple initialization schemes and existence proofs to nonzero biases, including explicit 'looks-linear' approaches for ReLU activation functions. These do not only enable truly orthogonal parameter initialization but also reduce potential pruning errors. In experiments on standard benchmark data, we further highlight the practical benefits of nonzero bias initialization schemes, and present theoretically inspired extensions for state-of-the-art strong lottery ticket pruning.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Oct 2021.

Builds on

30 of 43 references.

References · 30

  1. 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,590
  2. 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,250
  3. 2016Pruning Filters for Efficient ConvNetscited by 1,129
  4. 2018SNIP: Single-shot Network Pruning based on Connection Sensitivitycited by 802
  5. 2013Exact solutions to the nonlinear dynamics of learning in deep linear neural networkscited by 748
  6. 2019Linear Mode Connectivity and the Lottery Ticket Hypothesiscited by 627
  7. 2020Pruning neural networks without any data by iteratively conserving synaptic flowcited by 475
  8. 2020Picking Winning Tickets Before Training by Preserving Gradient Flowcited by 467
  9. 2019What's Hidden in a Randomly Weighted Neural Network?cited by 236
  10. 2017Learning to Prune Deep Neural Networks via Layer-wise Optimal Brain Surgeoncited by 219
  11. 2019Deconstructing Lottery Tickets: Zeros, Signs, and the Supermaskcited by 206
  12. 2020Proving the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Pruning is All You Needcited by 200
18 more
  1. 2016Deep Information Propagationcited by 194
  2. 2019Deep ReLU Networks Have Surprisingly Few Activation Patternscited by 160
  3. 2019Drawing Early-Bird Tickets: Towards More Efficient Training of Deep Networkscited by 160
  4. 2017The Shattered Gradients Problem: If resnets are the answer, then what is the question?cited by 156
  5. 2017Resurrecting the sigmoid in deep learning through dynamical isometry: theory and practicecited by 132
  6. 2019Winning the Lottery with Continuous Sparsificationcited by 99
  7. 2019A Signal Propagation Perspective for Pruning Neural Networks at Initializationcited by 96
  8. 2020Optimal Lottery Tickets via SubsetSum: Logarithmic Over-Parameterization is Sufficientcited by 81
  9. 2018The Emergence of Spectral Universality in Deep Networkscited by 74
  10. 2020Logarithmic Pruning is All You Needcited by 71
  11. 2020Sanity-Checking Pruning Methods: Random Tickets can Win the Jackpotcited by 66
  12. 2019A Mean Field Theory of Batch Normalizationcited by 58
  13. 2021Sanity Checks for Lottery Tickets: Does Your Winning Ticket Really Win the Jackpot?cited by 52
  14. 2020Robust Pruning at Initializationcited by 31
  15. 2020Pruning via Iterative Ranking of Sensitivity Statisticscited by 25
  16. 2021The Elastic Lottery Ticket Hypothesiscited by 23
  17. 2021Lottery Ticket Preserves Weight Correlation: Is It Desirable or Not?cited by 22
  18. 2016Generalized Dropoutcited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

4 papers.