mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

On some theoretical limitations of Generative Adversarial Networks

arXiv 2110.10915 ↗First posted 21 Oct 2021cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Generative Adversarial Networks have become a core technique in Machine Learning to generate unknown distributions from data samples. They have been used in a wide range of context without paying much attention to the possible theoretical limitations of those models. Indeed, because of the universal approximation properties of Neural Networks, it is a general assumption that GANs can generate any probability distribution. Recently, people began to question this assumption and this article is in line with this thinking. We provide a new result based on Extreme Value Theory showing that GANs can't generate heavy tailed distributions. The full proof of this result is given.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Oct 2021.

Builds on

5 of 16 references.

References · 5

  1. 2018Adversarial vulnerability for any classifiercited by 78
  2. 2020Random Matrix Theory Proves that Deep Learning Representations of GAN-data Behave as Gaussian Mixturescited by 47
  3. 2021Pareto GAN: Extending the Representational Power of GANs to Heavy-Tailed Distributionscited by 23
  4. 2019Copula & Marginal Flows: Disentangling the Marginal from its Jointcited by 17
  5. 2021Improved Estimation of Concentration Under ℓp-Norm Distance Metrics Using Half Spacescited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1.

2 papers.