SEA: Graph Shell Attention in Graph Neural Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A common issue in Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) is known as over-smoothing. By increasing the number of iterations within the message-passing of GNNs, the nodes' representations of the input graph align with each other and become indiscernible. Recently, it has been shown that increasing a model's complexity by integrating an attention mechanism yields more expressive architectures. This is majorly contributed to steering the nodes' representations only towards nodes that are more informative than others. Transformer models in combination with GNNs result in architectures including Graph Transformer Layers (GTL), where layers are entirely based on the attention operation. However, the calculation of a node's representation is still restricted to the computational working flow of a GNN. In our work, we relax the GNN architecture by means of implementing a routing heuristic. Specifically, the nodes' representations are routed to dedicated experts. Each expert calculates the representations according to their respective GNN workflow. The definitions of distinguishable GNNs result from k-localized views starting from the central node. We call this procedure Graph Shell Attention (SEA), where experts process different subgraphs in a transformer-motivated fashion. Intuitively, by increasing the number of experts, the models gain in expressiveness such that a node's representation is solely based on nodes that are located within the receptive field of an expert. We evaluate our architecture on various benchmark datasets showing competitive results compared to state-of-the-art models.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Oct 2021.
Builds on
20 of 28 references.
References · 20
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
- 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
- 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,320
- 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,393
- 2017Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layercited by 3,509
- 2021Switch Transformers: Scaling to Trillion Parameter Models with Simple and Efficient Sparsitycited by 3,073
- 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networkscited by 2,919
- 2020Open Graph Benchmark: Datasets for Machine Learning on Graphscited by 2,163
- 2020Benchmarking Graph Neural Networkscited by 680
8 more
- 2020A Generalization of Transformer Networks to Graphscited by 661
- 2019Green AIcited by 627
- 2020Heterogeneous Graph Transformercited by 582
- 2019Graph Transformer Networkscited by 523
- 2021Rethinking Graph Transformers with Spectral Attentioncited by 473
- 2021Do Transformers Really Perform Bad for Graph Representation?cited by 320
- 2017Community Detection and Stochastic Block Modelscited by 319
- 2020Directional Graph Networkscited by 133
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.
1 paper.