Multi-concept adversarial attacks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As machine learning (ML) techniques are being increasingly used in many applications, their vulnerability to adversarial attacks becomes well-known. Test time attacks, usually launched by adding adversarial noise to test instances, have been shown effective against the deployed ML models. In practice, one test input may be leveraged by different ML models. Test time attacks targeting a single ML model often neglect their impact on other ML models. In this work, we empirically demonstrate that naively attacking the classifier learning one concept may negatively impact classifiers trained to learn other concepts. For example, for the online image classification scenario, when the Gender classifier is under attack, the (wearing) Glasses classifier is simultaneously attacked with the accuracy dropped from 98.69 to 88.42. This raises an interesting question: is it possible to attack one set of classifiers without impacting the other set that uses the same test instance? Answers to the above research question have interesting implications for protecting privacy against ML model misuse. Attacking ML models that pose unnecessary risks of privacy invasion can be an important tool for protecting individuals from harmful privacy exploitation. In this paper, we address the above research question by developing novel attack techniques that can simultaneously attack one set of ML models while preserving the accuracy of the other. In the case of linear classifiers, we provide a theoretical framework for finding an optimal solution to generate such adversarial examples. Using this theoretical framework, we develop a multi-concept attack strategy in the context of deep learning. Our results demonstrate that our techniques can successfully attack the target classes while protecting the protected classes in many different settings, which is not possible with the existing test-time attack-single strategies.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Oct 2021.
Builds on
20 of 31 references.
References · 20
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 7,005
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
- 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,693
- 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
- 2016Adversarial Machine Learning at Scalecited by 936
- 2020Captum: A unified and generic model interpretability library for PyTorchcited by 547
- 2017Age Progression/Regression by Conditional Adversarial Autoencodercited by 429
- 2017Adversarial Examples: Attacks and Defenses for Deep Learningcited by 351
8 more
- 2019Adversarial Attacks and Defenses in Images, Graphs and Text: A Reviewcited by 237
- 2020fastai: A Layered API for Deep Learningcited by 183
- 2017The Space of Transferable Adversarial Examplescited by 158
- 2019The stochastic multi-gradient algorithm for multi-objective optimization and its application to supervised machine learningcited by 46
- 2015Exploring the Space of Adversarial Imagescited by 28
- 2017Towards Interpretable Deep Neural Networks by Leveraging Adversarial Examplescited by 27
- 2014Online Privacy as a Collective Phenomenoncited by 1
- 2019Photofeeler-D3: A Neural Network with Voter Modeling for Dating Photo Impression Predictioncited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.