mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

ERQA: Edge-Restoration Quality Assessment for Video Super-Resolution

arXiv 2110.09992 ↗First posted 19 Oct 2021eess.IV cs.CVcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Despite the growing popularity of video super-resolution (VSR), there is still no good way to assess the quality of the restored details in upscaled frames. Some SR methods may produce the wrong digit or an entirely different face. Whether a method's results are trustworthy depends on how well it restores truthful details. Image super-resolution can use natural distributions to produce a high-resolution image that is only somewhat similar to the real one. VSR enables exploration of additional information in neighboring frames to restore details from the original scene. The ERQA metric, which we propose in this paper, aims to estimate a model's ability to restore real details using VSR. On the assumption that edges are significant for detail and character recognition, we chose edge fidelity as the foundation for this metric. Experimental validation of our work is based on the MSU Video Super-Resolution Benchmark, which includes the most difficult patterns for detail restoration and verifies the fidelity of details from the original frame. Code for the proposed metric is publicly available at https://github.com/msu-video-group/ERQA.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Oct 2021.

Builds on

9 of 39 references.

References · 9

  1. 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,177
  2. 2021Real-ESRGAN: Training Real-World Blind Super-Resolution with Pure Synthetic Datacited by 970
  3. 2020Image Quality Assessment: Unifying Structure and Texture Similaritycited by 811
  4. 2018TDAN: Temporally Deformable Alignment Network for Video Super-Resolutioncited by 226
  5. 2019Recurrent Back-Projection Network for Video Super-Resolutioncited by 148
  6. 2016Learning a No-Reference Quality Metric for Single-Image Super-Resolutioncited by 144
  7. 2020Revisiting Temporal Modeling for Video Super-resolutioncited by 46
  8. 2021Image Super-Resolution Quality Assessment: Structural Fidelity Versus Statistical Naturalnesscited by 15
  9. 2018Toward Bridging the Simulated-to-Real Gap: Benchmarking Super-Resolution on Real Datacited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 3; 2025: 4; 2026: 4.

14 papers.

Sort:

By area: