Rebuilding Trust: Queer in AI Approach to Artificial Intelligence Risk Management
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Trustworthy artificial intelligence (AI) has become an important topic because trust in AI systems and their creators has been lost. Researchers, corporations, and governments have long and painful histories of excluding marginalized groups from technology development, deployment, and oversight. As a result, these technologies are less useful and even harmful to minoritized groups. We argue that any AI development, deployment, and monitoring framework that aspires to trust must incorporate both feminist, non-exploitative participatory design principles and strong, outside, and continual monitoring and testing. We additionally explain the importance of considering aspects of trustworthiness beyond just transparency, fairness, and accountability, specifically, to consider justice and shifting power to the disempowered as core values to any trustworthy AI system. Creating trustworthy AI starts by funding, supporting, and empowering grassroots organizations like Queer in AI so the field of AI has the diversity and inclusion to credibly and effectively develop trustworthy AI. We leverage the expert knowledge Queer in AI has developed through its years of work and advocacy to discuss if and how gender, sexuality, and other aspects of queer identity should be used in datasets and AI systems and how harms along these lines should be mitigated. Based on this, we share a gendered approach to AI and further propose a queer epistemology and analyze the benefits it can bring to AI. We additionally discuss how to regulate AI with this queer epistemology in vision, proposing frameworks for making policies related to AI & gender diversity and privacy & queer data protection.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 1 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Sep 2021.
Builds on
1 of 44 references.
References · 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 5.
6 papers.
- 2023"I'm fully who I am": Towards Centering Transgender and Non-Binary Voices to Measure Biases in Open Language Generationcited by 56
- 2023Queer In AI: A Case Study in Community-Led Participatory AIcited by 33
- 2023Bound by the Bounty: Collaboratively Shaping Evaluation Processes for Queer AI Harmscited by 10
- 2022Detecting Harmful Online Conversational Content towards LGBTQIA+ Individualscited by 8
- 2023Enactive Artificial Intelligence: Subverting Gender Norms in Robot-Human Interactioncited by 1
- 2023Should they? Mobile Biometrics and Technopolicy meet Queer Community Considerationscited by 0
- 2023Should they? Mobile Biometrics and Technopolicy meet Queer Community Considerations6 Oct 2023
- 2023Bound by the Bounty: Collaboratively Shaping Evaluation Processes for Queer AI Harms15 Jul 2023
- 2023"I'm fully who I am": Towards Centering Transgender and Non-Binary Voices to Measure Biases in Open Language Generation17 May 2023
- 2023Queer In AI: A Case Study in Community-Led Participatory AI29 Mar 2023
- 2023Enactive Artificial Intelligence: Subverting Gender Norms in Robot-Human Interaction17 Jan 2023
- 2022Detecting Harmful Online Conversational Content towards LGBTQIA+ Individuals15 Jun 2022