Finding Strong Gravitational Lenses Through Self-Attention
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The upcoming large scale surveys like LSST are expected to find approximately 105 strong gravitational lenses by analysing data of many orders of magnitude larger than those in contemporary astronomical surveys. In this case, non-automated techniques will be highly challenging and time-consuming, even if they are possible at all. We propose a new automated architecture based on the principle of self-attention to find strong gravitational lenses. The advantages of self-attention-based encoder models over convolution neural networks are investigated, and ways to optimise the outcome of encoder models are analysed. We constructed and trained 21 self-attention based encoder models and five convolution neural networks to identify gravitational lenses from the Bologna Lens Challenge. Each model was trained separately using 18,000 simulated images, cross-validated using 2,000 images, and then applied to a test set with 100,000 images. We used four different metrics for evaluation: classification accuracy, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), the TPR0 score and the TPR10 score. The performances of self-attention-based encoder models and CNNs participating in the challenge are compared. They were able to surpass the CNN models that participated in the Bologna Lens Challenge by a high margin for the TPR0 and TPR_10. Self-Attention based models have clear advantages compared to simpler CNNs. They have highly competing performance in comparison to the currently used residual neural networks. Compared to CNNs, self-attention based models can identify highly confident lensing candidates and will be able to filter out potential candidates from real data. Moreover, introducing the encoder layers can also tackle the over-fitting problem present in the CNNs by acting as effective filters.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Oct 2021.
Builds on
17 of 38 references.
References · 17
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
- 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,414
- 2021RoFormer: Enhanced Transformer with Rotary Position Embeddingcited by 4,703
- 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,611
- 2018Dual Attention Network for Scene Segmentationcited by 1,003
- 2018Self-Attention Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 809
- 2019Stand-Alone Self-Attention in Vision Modelscited by 542
5 more
- 2020Exploring Self-attention for Image Recognitioncited by 313
- 2021Relative Positional Encoding for Transformers with Linear Complexitycited by 37
- 2018Diagnose like a Radiologist: Attention Guided Convolutional Neural Network for Thorax Disease Classificationcited by 36
- 2020Explicitly Modeled Attention Maps for Image Classificationcited by 3
- 2021A Comparative Study of Convolutional Neural Networks for the Detection of Strong Gravitational Lensingcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.
1 paper.