Projected Model Counting: Beyond Independent Support
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The past decade has witnessed a surge of interest in practical techniques for projected model counting. Despite significant advancements, however, performance scaling remains the Achilles' heel of this field. A key idea used in modern counters is to count models projected on an independent support that is often a small subset of the projection set, i.e. original set of variables on which we wanted to project. While this idea has been effective in scaling performance, the question of whether it can benefit to count models projected on variables beyond the projection set, has not been explored. In this paper, we study this question and show that contrary to intuition, it can be beneficial to project on variables beyond the projection set. In applications such as verification of binarized neural networks, quantification of information flow, reliability of power grids etc., a good upper bound of the projected model count often suffices. We show that in several such cases, we can identify a set of variables, called upper bound support (UBS), that is not necessarily a subset of the projection set, and yet counting models projected on UBS guarantees an upper bound of the true projected model count. Theoretically, a UBS can be exponentially smaller than the smallest independent support. Our experiments show that even otherwise, UBS-based projected counting can be more efficient than independent support-based projected counting, while yielding bounds of very high quality. Based on extensive experiments, we find that UBS-based projected counting can solve many problem instances that are beyond the reach of a state-of-the-art independent support-based projected model counter.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Oct 2021.
Builds on
12 of 41 references.
References · 12
- 2019Quantitative Verification of Neural Networks And its Security Applicationscited by 56
- 2020The Model Counting Competition 2020cited by 24
- 2013A Scalable Approximate Model Countercited by 20
- 2013Taming the Curse of Dimensionality: Discrete Integration by Hashing and Optimizationcited by 12
- 2020Manthan: A Data Driven Approach for Boolean Function Synthesiscited by 11
- 2013A Scalable and Nearly Uniform Generator of SAT Witnessescited by 10
- 2021Partition Function Estimation: A Quantitative Studycited by 8
- 2020Sparse Hashing for Scalable Approximate Model Counting: Theory and Practicecited by 7
- 2015Constrained Sampling and Counting: Universal Hashing Meets SAT Solvingcited by 6
- 2014Balancing Scalability and Uniformity in SAT Witness Generatorcited by 5
- 2017Probabilistic Model Counting with Short XORscited by 5
- 2017Towards Parallel Boolean Functional Synthesiscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
2 papers.
- 2023Rounding Meets Approximate Model Countingcited by 6
- 2025Systematic Parameter Decision in Approximate Model Countingcited by 0
- 2025Systematic Parameter Decision in Approximate Model Counting8 Apr 2025
- 2023Rounding Meets Approximate Model Counting16 May 2023