mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Developing a novel fair-loan-predictor through a multi-sensitive debiasing pipeline: DualFair

arXiv 2110.08944 ↗First posted 17 Oct 2021cs.LG cs.AI cs.CYcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning (ML) models are increasingly used for high-stake applications that can greatly impact people's lives. Despite their use, these models have the potential to be biased towards certain social groups on the basis of race, gender, or ethnicity. Many prior works have attempted to mitigate this "model discrimination" by updating the training data (pre-processing), altering the model learning process (in-processing), or manipulating model output (post-processing). However, these works have not yet been extended to the realm of multi-sensitive parameters and sensitive options (MSPSO), where sensitive parameters are attributes that can be discriminated against (e.g race) and sensitive options are options within sensitive parameters (e.g black or white), thus giving them limited real-world usability. Prior work in fairness has also suffered from an accuracy-fairness tradeoff that prevents both the accuracy and fairness from being high. Moreover, previous literature has failed to provide holistic fairness metrics that work with MSPSO. In this paper, we solve all three of these problems by (a) creating a novel bias mitigation technique called DualFair and (b) developing a new fairness metric (i.e. AWI) that can handle MSPSO. Lastly, we test our novel mitigation method using a comprehensive U.S mortgage lending dataset and show that our classifier, or fair loan predictor, obtains better fairness and accuracy metrics than current state-of-the-art models.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Oct 2021.

Builds on

12 of 34 references.

References · 12

  1. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  2. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  3. 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 802
  4. 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
  5. 2018AI Fairness 360: An Extensible Toolkit for Detecting, Understanding, and Mitigating Unwanted Algorithmic Biascited by 319
  6. 2018Path-Specific Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 179
  7. 2017A Convex Framework for Fair Regressioncited by 147
  8. 2018Aequitas: A Bias and Fairness Audit Toolkitcited by 145
  9. 2021Bias in Machine Learning Software: Why? How? What to do?cited by 92
  10. 2018Understanding the Origins of Bias in Word Embeddingscited by 90
  11. 2018Fairness-aware Classification: Criterion, Convexity, and Boundscited by 14
  12. 2021Using Adversarial Debiasing to Remove Bias from Word Embeddingscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 2.

3 papers.